Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32194/2014bail granted

Randhir Kumar @ Randhir Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2014-12-24Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32194 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -321 Year- 2013 Thana -BUDDHACOLONY District- PATNA ====================================================== Randhir Kumar @ Randhir Yadav son of Sri Mirza Rai resident of Dujra Maszid Gali, Police Station - Buddha Colony, Distt. - Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Niraj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar Roy(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 24-12-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Buddha Colony P.S. Case No. 321 of 2013 registered for offence under section 25 (1-b) a/26 of the Arms Act Allegedly, acting on a tip off, a raid was conducted and the petitioner was caught and on search, one loaded country made pistol was recovered.

Submission at the bar for release of the petitioner is that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 28. 12. 2013 and the search and seizure are not in accordance with law. The petitioner has been sufficiently punished by remaining in custody to which the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32194 of 2014 (3) dt.24-12-2014 2/2 learned APP does not oppose.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the period of detention, the petitioner Randhir Kumar @ Randhir Yadav is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri Ravi Ranjan, learned Judicial Magistrate 1st class, Patna in connection with Buddha Colony P. S. Case No. 321 of 2013, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the Court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Sudha/- U T