Ali Raja v. The State Of Bihar
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.33392 of 2013 ====================================================== Ali Raja S/o Late Islam Mian Resident of Village Hasanpura, P.S. M.H. Nagar Hasanpura, District Siwan.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA ORAL ORDER 24-12-2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional P.P. for the State.
The petitioner prays for anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 364, 384, 120B and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case for the sole reason that he is brother-in-law (sala) of the uncle-in-law (mamera sasur) of the boy who is stated to have been abducted and thus for that very reason he has been falsely implicated in this case although he has no role to play in the matter. It is further submitted that the complaint itself has been made after a lapse of nearly 8-9 months and prior to that the co-accused Kadam Rasool had himself instituted a Sanha in Dewaria Police Station which had submitted its report on 29.2.2011. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33392 of 2013 (4) dt.24-12-2013 Learned Additional P.P., however, points out that it has come during the course of investigation that the main allegation, in fact, is against this very petitioner and panchayati was also held in which accused persons including the petitioner had stated that they would see that the boy returns home but nothing was done by them.
On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J) spal/-