Raj Kishore Prasad v. The State Of Bihar Through The District Magistrate

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.640 of 2026 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19080 of 2019 ====================================================== 1.

Raj Kishore Prasad Son of Late Raghuvir Prasad, Resident of Village Hemtpur Dighwara, P.O. and P.S.- Dighwara, District- Saran. 2.

Nabab Anshari, Son of Late Muhmad Hadis, Resident of Village Hemtpur Dighwara, P.O. and P.S.- Dighwara, District- Saran. 3.

Sunil Kumar Sharma, Son of Chandradeep Sharma, Resident of Village Dighwara, P.O. and P.S.- Dighwara, District- Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate Saran at Chapra Mr. Vaibhav Srivastava.

2.

Mr. Laxman Tiwari, Deputy Development Commissioner cum Chief Executive Officer, Chhapra.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Lalan Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Standing Counsel 7 For the Zila Parishad : Mr. Bajarangi Lal, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 31-07-2026 Heard Mr. Lalan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Bajarangi Lal representing Zila Parishad, Saran at Chapra.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:

"for initiating the proceeding of contempt against the opposite parties for their willfully and deliberately disobedience of the order

Patna High Court MJC No.640 of 2026(5) dt.31-07-2026 2/2 dated 03.07.2023 passed in C.W.J.C.

No. 19080 of 2019 by the Hon'ble Court."

3. A supplementary show cause of Deputy Development Commissioner-Cum-Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Saran at Chapra is on record and the petitioner has been allotted a shop with a direction to execute agreement. Though learned counsel for the petitioner has some reservation as the place has been changed, in the opinion of the Court, these are the things which can be agitated before the Court by filing a different petition.

4. This Court is convinced that order stands complied. The petitioner still has any grievance have always the liberty to agitate the matter.

5.Accordingly, MJC No. 640 of 2026 is disposed of. (Rajiv Roy, J) ankita/- U