Dilip Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54561 of 2016 (2) dt.23-12-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54561 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -150 Year- 2016 Thana -SHEOHAR District- SHEOHAR ====================================================== Dilip Sahni, Son of Late Gonaur Sahni, Resident of village - Lakshminiya, P.S. Shyampur Bhatahan, District - Sheohar.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Devendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Jitendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 23-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sheohar P.S. Case No. 150 of 2016 registered for the offence punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, 20-25 unknown miscreants armed with country made pistol and Danda came at the house of the informant and looted away the articles such as gold and silver ornament, clothes, ATM Cards, T.V. and cash of Rs. 65,000/-. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 07.10.2016 only on the basis of confessional statement of Ranjit Sahni and Bachchu Sahni and that Ranjit Sahni has been admitted to bail vide order dated 28.11.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 50940 of 2016, the petitioner has not been put on test identification parade and nothing has been recovered

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54561 of 2016 (2) dt.23-12-2016 from his conscious possession.

Learned APP fairly submits that co-accused Ranjit Sahni has already been allowed bail.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheohar in connection with Sheohar P.S. Case No. 150 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T