Prahalad Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31009 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-132 Year-2020 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Saran ====================================================== PRAHALAD MAHTO, Son of Sharma Mahto Resident of Village- Ekma, P.S.- Ekma, District- Saran at Chapra.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Dewendra Narayan Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Matloob Rab, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 21-12-2020 This matter has been taken up in virtual court. Let the defects be removed within two weeks of the start of the physical Court.
Heard the parties.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
Liquor was recovered from the open barandah in front of the hotel of the petitioner. Petitioner has got criminal antecedent under the Excise Act.
Considering the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and bar of the prayer of anticipatory bail under Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in connection with
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31009 of 2020(2) dt.21-12-2020 2/2 Excise Case No. 132 of 2020.
Hence, prayer is refused.
In the event of surrender of the petitioner, prayer for regular bail shall be considered without being prejudiced by this order.
(Birendra Kumar, J) mantreshwar/- U T