Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32111/2014bail granted

Ranjan Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2014-12-24Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32111 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -261 Year- 2009 Thana -JHAJHA District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Ranjan Paswan Son of Ram Bhajju Paswan resident of village - Kawar, P.S. Jhajha, District - Jamui .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Suresh Pd. Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 24-12-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Sessions Trial No. 651/2010 arising out of Jhajha P.S.Case No. 261/2009 registered for the offence punishable under sections 302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The case has been lodged against unknown for murdering of an unknown man and during investigation, coacused Lalan Paswan was apprehended and in his confessional statement, the name of the petitioner has transpired. Submission is that only on suspicion, the petitioner is suffering in custody and confessional statement has got no

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32111 of 2014 (3) dt.24-12-2014 2/2 evidentiary value in the eye of law and there is no other material and that co-accused Lalan Paswan has been allowed bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 17764/2010 by another Bench of this Court and as such petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration to which the learned APP does not oppose .

In the facts and circumstances stated above and considering the fact that the co-accused has been allowed bail, the petitioner Ranjan Paswan is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 1st Additional District and Sessions Judge, Jamui in S.T. No. 651/2010 arising out of Jhajha P. S. Case No. 261/2009, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the Court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Sudha/- U T