Nitu Kumari v. The State Of Bihar
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35548 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-126 Year-2017 Thana- MIRGANJ District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.
Nitu Kumari D/o of Dilip Kumar Yadav Resident of Village - Brahkona, P.S.- Mirganj, Distt - Purnea.
2.
Lavli Kumari @ Lavli Kumar D/o Dilip Kumar Yadav Resident of Village - Brahkona, P.S.- Mirganj, Distt - Purnea.
3.
Manju Devi Wife of Dilip Kumar Yadav Resident of Village - Brahkona, P.S.- Mirganj, Distt - Purnea.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vijay Shankar Shrivastava, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Suman Kumari Singh, Adv.
For the State :
Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RANA VIKRAM SINGH ORAL ORDER 31-07-2026 Mr. Vijay Shankar Shrivastava, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the application on account of it being infructuous.
2. Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, learned APP for the State is present.
3. Prayer is allowed.
4. The present application is dismissed as withdrawn (Rana Vikram Singh, J) Supratim/- U