← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/20017/2012disposed

Smit Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-12-21Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20017 of 2012 ====================================================== Smita Kumari W/O Rajesh Kumar R/O Village- Morkahi, P.O.- Hathwan, P.S.- Alauli, District- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Human Resource Department, New Secretariat, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate-Cum-Collector, Khagaria 3.

The District Superintendent Of Education-Cum-District Programming CoOrdinator, Khagaria 4.

The Member District Teacher Appointment Appellate Authority, Khagaria 5.

The Block Development Officer, Alauli, District- Khagaria 6.

The Block Education Extention Officer, Alauli, District- Khagaria 7.

The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Hathwan Under Block- Alauli, DistrictKhagaria 8.

The Panchayat Secretary Hathwan Gram Panchayat, Alauli Block, DistrictKhagaria 9.

Smt. Hira Kumari, D/O Pramod Yadav R/O Village- Hathwan, P.O.- Hathwan, P.S.- Alauli, District- Khagaria ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Awanindra Kumar Jha, Advocate Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

S.C. 10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-12-2019 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application. He submits that petitioner may be granted a liberty to approach the State Appellate Authority against the impugned decision of the District Education Appellate Tribunal.

The application stands disposed of.

Patna High Court CWJC No.20017 of 2012(5) dt.21-12-2019 2/2 The petitioner shall have liberty to approach the State Appellate Authority. If any such application is filed before the State Appellate Authority, pendency of this case in this Court from 2012 may be taken into account while considering condonation of delay in preferring appeal.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) S.Ali/- U