Anita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.75618 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2018 Thana- PANJWARA District- Banka ====================================================== Anita Devi, Wife of Mister Yadav @ Mr. Yadav, Resident of Village- Rambol, P.S.- Panjwara, District- Banka.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Bhushan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 21-12-2018 Heard both sides.

Petitioner apprehends her arrest in Panjwara P.S. Case No.72 of 2018, registered under Sections 147, 149, 224, 225, 323, 332, 333, 353, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The gist of the allegation is that the son of the petitioner was arrested in connection with Panjwara P.S. Case No.51 of 2018, registered under Sections 379 and 411/34 of the Indian Penal Code but the petitioner resisted and snatched the rifle of a Constable and also got her son freed from the custody of the police. In the meantime, many other persons such as Ramanand Yadav, Bikram Yadav, Gurudeo Yadav came and got the son of the petitioner freed from the custody of the police. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a lady. She has falsely been implicated in this case

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.75618 of 2018(2) dt.21-12-2018 2/2 on account of dirty village politics but on the face of it, it appears that the police arrested Akash Yadav, the son of the petitioner in a case registered under Sections 379 and 411/34 of the Indian Penal Code but the petitioner resisted the arrest of her son and tried to snatch the rifle from a Constable and also incited others to get her son freed from the custody of the police.

Considering the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) S.KUMAR/- U T