Patna High CourtCR. MISC./55516/2016rejected

Upendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2016-12-23Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.55516 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -125 Year- 2016 Thana -GHOSI District- JEHANABAD ====================================================== Upendra Yadav, Son of Late Ram Swaroop Yadav, resident of Village - Bandhuganj, P.S. - Ghosi, District - Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyadev Prasad Singh Yadav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 23-12-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

This is an application for grant of regular bail for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 337, 325, 307, 379 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has earlier moved this Court for grant of bail but the said application was permitted to be withdrawn. It has further been submitted that allegation against the petitioner that he assaulted the informant but the injuries as mentioned in the injury report, caused by hard and blunt weapon. The petitioner has been in judicial custody since 31.08.2016.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides. It appears from the perusal bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55516 of 2016 (2) dt.23-12-2016 2/2 application that petitioner earlier moved this Court for grant of bail, but the said application was permitted to be withdrawn by the order of Hon'ble the Chief Justice, dated 04.10.2016. It further appears from the perusal of the injury report that the injuries caused on the person of the informant is grievous in nature, I am not inclined to grant the petitioner, the privilege of regular bail, accordingly, same is rejected.

However, considering the fact that petitioner has been judicial custody since 31.08.2016, learned Trial Court is directed to commit the case to the Court of Sessions and expedite the trial and conclude it as soon as possible.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T