← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41383/2016allowed

Vinay Kumar Sharma @ Vinay Kumar And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2026-04-30Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra2 pages

This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41383 of 2016 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1434 Year-2015 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== 1.

Vinay Kumar Sharma @ Vinay Kumar and Ors son of late Devi Prasad 2.

Vijay Kumar Sharma @ Vijay Kumar @ Bijju Sharma son of late Devi Prasad 3.

Vishwanath Prasad @ Millu son of Viphan Lal All are residents of mohalla - Bari Patan Devi Lane South of Mahavir Mandir, P.O. - Guljarbagh, P.S. - Alamganj, District - Patna.

4.

Sakuntala Devi wife of Anant Sharma, daughter of late Devi Prasad Resident of H.E.C. Ranchi, Jharkhand.

5.

Shobha Devi wife of Nand Kishor Sharma, Daughter of Late Devi Prasad resident of Jamshedpur, District - Jamshedpur, Jharkhand. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

State of Bihar and Anr 2.

Manoj Kumar son of late Ram Gopal Lal Resident of mohalla - Chailitar, P.o. - Guljarbagh, P.S. - Alamganj, District - Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nagendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-11-2023 Nobody is present on behalf of the Petitioner despite repeated calls.

2. However, Ld. APP for the State is present.

3. Perused the case record. It transpires that even on the last date, nobody was present on behalf of the Petitioner to attend the matter and the Petitioner was cautioned to attend the matter on the next date of hearing. Despite such cautioning, the Petitioner is not present to attend the matter, which shows

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41383 of 2016(4) dt.28-11-2023 2/2 that the Petitioner has lost interest to pursue the present case.

4. Hence, the present petition is dismissed for default.

(Jitendra Kumar, J) chandan/- U T