Rudal Mian v. The State Of Bihar
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.67452 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2018 Thana- CHHAURADANO District- East Champaran ====================================================== Rudal Mian, Son of Mahamaddin Mian, Resident of Village- Chandraman, P.S.- Mahuawa, District- East Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Sri Indra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 21-12-2018 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Chauradano (Mahuawa) P.S. Case No. 4 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Petitioner happens to be husband of the deceased and allegation against him is of causing dowry death of the deceased.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been made accused in this case and in fact the deceased died to illness and further the postmortem report also does not show the cause of death. Petitioner has been in judicial custody since 11.01.2018.
Learned counsel for the State as well as learend
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.67452 of 2018(3) dt.21-12-2018 2/2 counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that petitioner is husband of the deceased and there was demand of dowry.
Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined enlarge the petitioner on bail.
This application is accordingly dismissed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunilkumar/- U T