Md. Taukir Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68233 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-157 Year-2025 Thana- RAGHUNATHPUR District- Siwan ====================================================== Md. Taukir Ansari S/o Ehsan Ansari Resident of Village -Raghunathpur, P.S - Raghunathpur, District - Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Tiwary, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Humayou Ahmad Khan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 17-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Raghunathpur P.S Case No. 157 of 2025 dated 11.06.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 137(2), 87, 351(2) of the BNS, 2023.

3. As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner has kidnapped the daughter of the informant namely Megha Sharma aged 21 years from her house. Thereafter, informant's daughter anyway informed that Petitioner is trying to flee outside of the state by train from Siwan further saying that he used to assault her badly and pressurizing her to change her religion. Thereafter, the informant reached at Siwan Railway Station

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68233 of 2025(3) dt.17-12-2025 2/3 where she saved her daughter from the petitioner. Due to assault her daughter has received injuries and she is under treatment.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He next submits that daughter of the informant had went with the petitioner with her own free will. He further submits that petitioner has been falsely been implicated in this case only on suspicion and due to dirty village politics. He further submits that petitioner and the informant's daughter were in love affairs with each other. It is also submitted that petitioner is in judicial custody since 12.06.2025 having clean antecedent.

5. However, learned APP for the State oppose the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. On perusal of the FIR, case diary, Statement of victim under Section 183 of the BNSS and the impugned order dated 25.08.2025, it appears that petitioner allured the victim and took her to Siwan at his friends house and made sexual intercourse, after which she stayed there till June, 2025 and used to assault her brutally. In the meantime, petitioner used to torture the victim for the money and took her jewellery worth Rs. One Lakhs and used to assault her and always pressurize her to change her religion. So considering the serious nature of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68233 of 2025(3) dt.17-12-2025 3/3 allegation and submission made on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Sunnykr/- U