Sunny Kumar @ Rohit @ Sunny v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.69167 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-166 Year-2018 Thana- KHAGAUL District- Patna ====================================================== Sunny Kumar @ Rohit @ Sunny Son of Late Vijay Prasad, resident of Village- Kothawan, P.S. Khagaul and District- Patna (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Saket Gupta For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Parmanand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 21-12-2018 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Khagaul P.S. Case No. 166 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 386, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Prosecution case is that the informant is a contractor, who is engaged in electrical works of Indian Railway and it is alleged that a demand of extortion was made from him by the petitioner saying that he is Ritlal Mukhiya and if the informant wants to continue his work smoothly, he will have to pay the extortion money. Apart from that petitioner is an accused in one more case.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been made accused in this case and he was

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.69167 of 2018(4) dt.21-12-2018 2/2 working on the instruction of his boss. Further no offence under Section 386 of the Indian Penal Code is made out against the petitioner. Petitioner has been in judicial custody for six months.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the criminal antecedents of the petitioner, I am not inclined enlarge the petitioner on bail. This application is accordingly dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunilkumar/- U T