R.K.Tiwari v. The Managing Director Rajya V.V.N.Andors.
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
<r»<i«»»»«^«» ¥i®i aj .c-isni.iisa'OB. asc ^Q 9gs' '<E?»y ®'(Knsou.iasa N1 ^v^^.
^^^^ % ^^^'
^ ^ v % *X ^sqsBff- •''j.iaTia tecsCTne aoTBTAr(T{ Tsr.in^T.ta&j a'B'i.B'ee qtnog .i»'sT;3r? ^saxos rnaeTSlA-sa atffi*^ 'S'T'
ropTT-eTte 'aqse-p siaienn •Wt •avayi el'B3fl:A g»A' B^f'W 'S *"H aciss-tA^a- ^.safcaS ejxWQ.
asaai'a i-eao-pSATc a%*e •-ST mS'-fesw ' 3PE%.a.n<;:pTA ^'j.&Too®saTanoE fscvSvSm •SS pe q.w-n 'WBS'K s:«!i'yi.?BA..'B£f8a 'z 's * atS.S8ae?t WsWafi-WS^^^S^ 9% 'S .^ri ^Hs^""'
^p3 'S''?' T®niE" XKS^ iBlirweS.
'saTpTyig a'B.iswoea <PS'}.TII?I '-BBgTT s^-a'TA as& ;el?c18a 'OS^PS-e 'B^'r!p!i®l_ \ ..„.„__ '"* '•sf.'^st<TS^5w;'esKQT!S.'XS B'l.Bepaoaseg S(IS<!@A vfv1 'ganp- *Trie(5<'T19nT '"'^it 'xesnS s»°«^' TawTS *T *8 Ta-iC 'B/S sa 5 ^aSS TasitTj, *S*3 ?6/ 'os s^'a.ssa i.ia y ^.
:....- .. .
..- - .
, - EStf'ilgi 'wsvs 3.W.W iinissm sTOffts
mGH COCRT OP JUMCATURB CHHATHSeARH: BILAMtIR Sin^le Bench:
Hon'bte 8hrf 8«U»hK. Agrihotrl, J.
W.P,a^l6a80?_1995 R.K.Tiwari Petitioner Veraus Respondents :
The Maiiagiag Director & ottwrs None for the pctitioncr.
Shri Amit Venna, counsel for the respondent No. 3. None for fhe aespondents No. l, 2 and 4.
ORALOia>BR (28tt Fdwmiry, 3006| 1.
Fixed date S.P.C. was directed to be issucd to fhe petitioner as wefl as the rcspondcnts on 19.1.2006.
In rcsponsc to S.P.C., the respondent No.
1 is repiesented tfarough couascl.
2.
The inattcr was caUed for Itearing twice.
On both occasioxis, none appeared nor any reprcsentatfon was inade on behalfofthe petitioner.
3.
Accoidii^ty, the writ pctition is dismtesed for want of prosecution.
^TT-^-^- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge Babhi ,-., •-...-..-i^._.,.