Sushila Bai v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Others
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
'-'•' SUSHILA BAI, W/o Brij Mohan Agrawal, Aged about 60 years, R/o Vill. Than khamaria, Tahsil Saza, Dist. Durg(CG).
T*'
Through: Suresh Kumar, S/o Brij Mohan Agrawal, Aged about 42 years, Spe.c.icJ^ • ^"powerofAttorney Holder Ofthe Appellant Sushila Bai.
^l.i^.
1) STATE OF M.P. (NOW CHHATTISGARH) Through : Collector, Durg.
o ^/2) > Triveni Bai, Widow of Lakhan Singh, "' - Aged about 60 years -^^3) 5» Vijay Singh, S/o Lakhan Singh, ^ Aged about 34 years -• ^^ •^y '...:"':"^\':^^-'"" .,ft'4)S Raju, S/o LakhanSingh, '/ '^^•C^'
'"^ ' "
Aged about 27 years'
c?-'0"
5)Cy Toran, S/o Lakhan Singh, '^ -^ Aged about 22 years.
W!
"•'^* •?y»".
.
^"
•G) ^ Top Singh, S/oLakhan Singh,^ Aged about 22 years.
Respondents 2 to 6 are residents of R/o Vill. Than khamaria, Tahsil Saza, Dist. Durg(CG).
.
::1*' r^
7) 5 Urmila Singh, D/o Lakhan Singh, ^ W/s Shankar Singh, Aged about 40 years, R/o near Banjari Temple, Gole baz.ar, Raipur.
8) Kumari Bai, D/o Lakhan Singh, ^ W/o Narayan Singh, Aged about 36 years, R/o Vill. Chotepouni, Tahsil Mungeli, - Dist. Bilaspur.
^"•^s^..--.B--^i^s.i.'T;vii-rfe&
KI \ -29) Jamuna Bai, D/o Lakhan Singh, ^ W/o Jagat Singh, Aged about 32 years, R/o Vill. Gandai, Tahsil Khairagarh, Dist. Rajnandgaon.
10) Gaya Bai, D/o Lakhan Singh, ^ W/o Madan Singh, Aged about 28 years, R/o Vill. Hardisaiktara, Tahsil Lormi, Dist. Bilaspur.
11) Sarla Bai, D/o Lakhan Singh, v^ W/o Dev Singh, R/o Vill. Gopaltola, Tahsil Khairagarh, Dist. Rajnandgaon.
Respondents 2 to 11 ........Plaintiff Ram Bai, Widow of Gaind Singh, Aged about 55 years, -13) Maina Bai, W/o Purshottam Singh, Aged about 45 years, ^ff'
14) Sumitra Bai, W/o Salik Singh, Aged about 47 years 15) Sribati Bai, W/o Dhanush Singh, Aged about 50 years 16) Bimla Bai, W/o Madhurat Singh, Aged about 28 years 17) Rukhmani Bai, W/o Nandkumar, Aged about 26 years 18) Sano Bai, W/o Hansib Singh, Aged about 24 years 19) Sukrit Bai, W/o Sagar Singh, Aged about 22 years . 20) Jagat Pal Singh, S/o Gaind Singh Aged about 22 years 21) Radho Singh Bais, S/o Gaind Singh, Aged about 37 years.
22) Dilip. Singh Bais, S/o Gaind Singh, Aged about 21 years, 23) Chandrika Bai, Widow of Shiv Singh, Aged about 60 years, ....24) Prahlad Singh, S/o Ishwar Singh, . Aged about 42 years, :^:p^_^_ ?3 itij ~r1inirri^1ir^if^nf^I^NUt'fmr^-iirhasis«iUi*.on^^
tt ff -3- (D'> .
25) Ram Awtar Singh Bais, S/o Ishwar Singh, Aged about 34 years, - 26) Manik Singh Bais, S/o Ishwar Singh, Aged about 34 years, l-1eera Man Singh Bais, S/o Ishwar Singh, Aged about 24 years, ..-.-"27) Kanti Bai, W/o Hem Shankar Singh, Aged about 35 years, .28) Nirmala Baj, W/o Prakash Singh, Aged about 24 years, .29) 30) Shakuntala Bai, W/o Yashwant Singh, Aged about 21 years, no.12 to 30 ............ Defendants R/oVill. Kurda, Tahsii, Saza, Dist.'Durg (CG). ^es--^"'"
iVlisc. Civil Appeal passed by'Xbj, Others Vs Sushila against the judgement and ,decree dtd. 23.9.2002 Bemetera in Civil Appeal No. 56A/97 (Trjveni Bai & Bai & Others) by which Civil Suit no.'SSWI has trial court with a direction to declde the afresh
"'* .»s ^~S[ ^||q|y4|^ ^ft^FIS, fa|^liyy,< .^V2^...^...2..c../:.^3........•^20 sn^iraqT <=M<i[d<Hl ^T'H??!' 'if ifei<f) Tf^i^K ^affiw 31)^1 Rl?ffRS[R?
:^ sn^i a?t[iq;
T(mn ^fta .BI^I S.B.: Hon'ble K.
01.01.261.
rawal. J.
ned counsel for the deceased/ ynn vimiesn Bajpa', lea appeiiant.
ynn l-iant.
ueputv panel Lawver for the ynn yanjeev No.l/State.
astava.
counsei for tne yn" Anurao yn"\ No.2,3,4 and 6.
lied on 05.02.2009. Time was Smt. Sushila Bai had on 09.04.2009 to Tile &n applicauon ror substitution OT app6Hant.
OT m has been fiied for brinqing the l ili tn's dute no i5;^i-i as for "on 1 nus, me appyai, is eunstitiitinn ntt"e lenal renresft l^whfv^-.ii.i.as'lfS!
TLfi i.3 iiu- -^-•?ua(-'»i i au p/i ^J 1^S^ ttatives OT aeceasea yusniia yg as aoaiea.
ana as tne is 8d/- sanjay K. Agra^a!
Judge