Anil Agrawal v. C.G. State Industrial Development Corp.
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
Amended caused title
IN THE HO^'BJLEHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
AT BILASPUR W.PNo. 2197/2002 PETITIONSR Anil Agrawal S/o.BangaIilal Agrawal, R/o. 10,01d motilal Nehru Nagar (East), Bhilai, District durg (C.G.)
VERSUS
"RESPON33ENTS Chhattisgarh State Industrial Development Corporation, (A Goverinent of Chhatisgarh undertaking) Office at 1st Hoor, Udyog Bhawan, Ring Road No. 1, Telibandha, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Through its Chairman/ Managing Director"
\i '^"
WRJT F STITION^ UNDER ARTICLE OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR JSSUANCE^ OF WRIT NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARY . PROHIBITION AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS , ORDER OR ORDERS , DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS
'v;
^•^^ ";t^'
[^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR SB:HON'BLE SHRI NAVIN SINHA. ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE Writ Petition No. 2197 of 2002 PETITIONER Anil Agrawal ll
Versus
RESPONDENTS phhattisgarh State Industria!
Betetepgient Corporation and "aih©ffiaMU? ,,, NRITPETITION UNDERAKTICLE 226 OF THE CCMSEJTUTION OF a^3g'l!i€l{hDIA "1£ Appearance :
Shri Animesh WBR3®|BS®atefor the Petitioner.
Shri Kashif Shak®el,|^8vDgatefor the Respondents. l|i-':;W?:.^RDER "":SSS!iiipffiti2.2014) NAVIN SINHA, ACTING C.J.
1.
After some arguments leave is sought to withdraw the application for pursuing departmental proceedings. 2.
The Court makes no observation with regard to the same. 3.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- Acting Chief Justice sunita