Sudru Ram And ANR. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
M.C.C.No.
^IP^ /2014 (Arising out ofWrit Petition (C.) No. 2376/2014) APPLICANTS 1.
Sudru Ram, S/o Kayaram, aged aged about 40 years, Occupatian - Teacher, (Petitioners) 2.
Lachchhu Ram, S/o Kayaram, t ^f'
aged about 28 years, Occupation ^9S(fit/. .
S.T.F. (PoUce) •^'"rmTi^ hri/.»K..^r"*w '
Both are R/o village and Post /•^^j"rrial*rtt Teknar, Block and Tahsil ^<%.
^.<ft^l^<-iAMft 1TCS D^d--< Dantewada, Civil and Revenue District Dantewada (C.G.)
VERSUS
NON-APPLICANTS 1.
State of Chhattisgarh, Through: the Secretary, (Respondents) Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur (C.G.) 2.
The Collector, Dantewada (C.G.) 3.
Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division Dantewada (C.G.) 4.
Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Dantewada (C.G.) APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF THBCASE
'f •I .4 ^. M •,\ i XI^HC-78 w '^ "3^ vtiWM^, w^iwt^, Ridi'My v^^^..^LM!l....^z»t 3n^I<T5R!(»^<?y«ty) <hl^Ic«fll*lll+lclT'8{^<<fl <fa<^l< ^stt^Ri^n^r ^T^f^RTRtW ^Wl(§«^tl^ (TOSn^l^WfeR S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice Prash 23.12.2014 nt Kumar Mishra 1^» Shri Atanu Ghosh,couns^ ^lfortheapplicants.
Shrj Ajit Singh, Panel La4 lyer for the State.
Heard.
M.C.C. No. 988 of 2014.
This is an application jor restoration of W.P.(C) No.
for want of prosecutjon vide 2376/2014 which was dismisseld Court order dated 05/12/2014.
On due consideration anfa the restoration application, thisl for the reasons mentioned in M.C.C.
is allowed subject to payment of cost of Rs.1000/-(^ ^s. One thousandonly) to be Aid Committee.
deposited with the High Court Leiial The orde.r dated 05/12/20'
l|4is recalled.
W.P. (C) No. 2376/2014 isl jrestored to its original number.
Sd/- prashantKumarMishra Judge V-