Bhuvneshwar Prasad Kashyap v. Seema Bai And Others
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR MA No. 400 of 2006 Bhuneshwar Prasad Kashyap aged 45 years, S/o Late Shri Ramratan Kashyap, R/o Behind D.R Vipra College Tikrapara (Diprapara, PO and Distt. Bilaspur(CG) --Appellant
Versus
1.
Seema Bai aged about 35 years wd/o. Late Shri Gopal Singh 2.
Rambha Bai aged about 73 years wd/o late Shri Babu Singh 3.
Mamita Singh aged about 11 years, D/o late Shri Gopal Singh 4.
Jainendra Sirigh^ QyBa^S/o late Shri gopal Singh 5.
Swarnika Singhp^^^ Gy^arsyMoQ. Late Shri Gopal Singh 6.
Manuraj Singh aged about 4 years, son of late SM^^^^^^^^^^^ Singh, R-3 to 6 minorthrough mgther and natural gua^anBn All R/o. Tarod, PM,iMiQ^^iBJi\s\\/\k JanjyQhampa 7.
Salikram aged QbQ ^j(^affi:^o. Vedram Suryavanshi R/o Kohoka RS. ShivMQra^gir|;;@|is|. Janjgir Champa (CG) 8.
Oriental Insurance Com'la^^ in front of Narmal School (Now High Court) P.0. AndfDlstiBjlaspur (CG) --- Respondents Forappellant None.
O RD E R 23-12-2016 1.
None for the appellant when the case is taken up for hearing even in second round.
2.
In this circumstance, this court is left with no opiion except to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.
3. The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Chandra Bhushan Bajpai) Judge Pathak