Harishchandra Joshi v. Ku.Diksha Joshi And ANR.
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
&»stftisscisiB@yii
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTLSGARH ATBILASPTLR
M.C.C.^NO. 10°4 OF 2014 APPLICANT/ APPELLANT/ NON-APPLICANT N0.1 Harishchandra Joshi, S/o Late Shri Nanku, aged about years, R/o Behind Machhi Talab, Santoshi Mandir, Gudhiyari, Raipur (CG).
Versus
1.
^_--Ku.Diksha Joshi, aged about 18 years.
ft^^ONDENT/ APPLICANT NON-APPLICANT RESPONDENT/ NON-APPLICANT N0.2 Smt. Savitri Joshi, aged about 55 years.
Both are R/o House of Shesh Narayan Dewangan, Machhi Talab, Near ShiUa Mandir, Gudhiyari,^Raipur (CG).
APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF FIRST APPEAL (M) N0.28 OF 2014 \:
^^
'•-"h 's. \ t-s»"fs^..- '^sr-.s-- ^ ^A
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR
DIVISION BENCH HON'BLE MR.T.P. SHARMA. & HON'BLE MR. I.S. UBOWEJA. JJ M.C.C.No. 1004 of 2014 Applicant Harishchandra Joshi versus Respondents Ku. Diksha Joshi and another.
APPLICATION.FDRKBStQR/CTION ©1=F.A.(Ml No. 28 of 2014 Ap|iearance:
Mr.S.R.J. Jaiswal, counsel forthe appliGant.
None for the resppndents.
O R D E R
(23.12.2014) T.P. SHARMA. J 1.
Heard on restoratiQn,petiti6n.i 2.
This is petition forrestpratjon of F.A.(M)No.28/2014, dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 26.11.2014. 3.
On due consideration, the petition allowed.
F.A.(M) No. 28/2014, dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 26.11.2014, is restored to its original number. No order asto costs.
-- - Sd/-.
Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge ;
InderSiagh Uboweja Judge Vijay