M.P.Goutam v. Cg.State Co-Op.Mkg Federation Ltd.Andors
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
• (D „ s-\^ cL^ c , BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.No.^^<< /2004 PETITIONER .•• M.P.Goutam, S/o. Ramdulare Goutam/ aged about 58 years, R/o.
Kisan Rice Mill Baramkela, Raigarh M..--C ^^.-•s^ fy'^^^ ...^y^'
?l<e^'..RESPONDENTS
VERSUS
1.
Chhattisgarh State Marketing Coop.Federation Ltd., .V ^^"
Through the Secretary, 880 Civil Lines, Raipur (C.G.).
2.
The State Govt. of Chhattisgarh.
Through the Secretary, Ministry of Co-operative Department/ D.K.S.Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.) 3.
Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Labhandi Farm, Raipur (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2267227 OF THE llt^.;
f^ k:^ft.
•^Q CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. FOR ISSUNCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS / ORDERS AND DIRECTION .-.„..
^^^.^^....^-^3^.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR S.B.:
HON'BLE SHRI NAVIN SINHA. ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE WRIT PETITION N0. 2626 OF 2004 PETITIONERS M.P. Goutam
Versus
RESPONDENTS Chhattisgarh State Marketing Co-op.
Federation Ltd. and others (WRIT PETITiONUNDERARTICLE 226/227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIAl ADpearance:
Nbne for the Petitioner.
Mr. Shailendra Shuk|a,AdyocateforRespondent 1. Mr. B. Gop Kumar, Dy. Advocate General for the State/Respondents 2 and 3.
ORDER
(24th December, 2014) 1.
Nonefor the Petitioner.
2.
Learned Counsel for the Respondents submitted that with the ^'
passage of time, the apptication has become infructuous because the dispute related to age for retirement.
3.
The application is disposed as infructuous.
Sd/- Ag. Chief Justice Anu