← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWP/2468/2005withdrawn

Prayag Choubey v. Union Of India And ORS.

2014-12-24Hon'Ble The Acting Chief Justice3 pages

®8£i?31 BiiSbi ;rai ^.p°^ e'^ti.'iilj ^/^- ( crv^

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

WRIT PETITION N0^4^S /2005. (^S^ Prayag Choubey, aged about 59 years PETITIONER ^t^ ^ S/o Late Shri Gangadhar Choubey, R/o 7/1-A, Face-1, Prayag Bhawan, Maitry Nagar, Risali, Po. Bhitai, Distt.

Durg (C.G.), [Fitter, P.no.10450, CEZ] >;-^ ^^ -<....^\. ^ ••-s*'

VERSUS

asS*'

v^?

,»••''

1) Union of India, Through : Secretary, Ministry of L Iron and Steel, Parliament House, New Delhi.

2) Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd.

(A Public Sector Enterprise), through its 'w '^'•i l^l^^l Chairman - Cum - Managing Director, Kolkata.

?•"• ^ .,^'y 3) Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd. (Local Unit at ^,>., Bhilai) through General ^c-^^s p'b'^ l3^ Manager, P.

O.

Bhilai, Distt.

Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 QF THE ^ CONSTITUTION FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF ^Q^.

^•V'CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS AND ANY OTHER i^ ^ sW .-", '^'•k* -s^ WRIT / DIRECTION / ORDER.

••vS''v ^^ , !-^'.is"

M i^^ •i'^T^'

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUfi SB:HON'BLE SHRI NAVIN SINHA. ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE Writ Petition No.2466 of2005 P.M. Shukla PETITIQNER

Versus

Union of India and others Writ Petition NoJ146tf)£ •R.B. Nayak f'ETITIQNER 7-4^^'.'S^~sfc^iL l',Usfi-flakfrSiWl Union of India and others ^w^n-~:'ii:MErttieti(Kl>n No.2468 of 2005 'i-ic^^q uRIrT Prayag Choubey PETITIQ^NER

Versus

Union of India and others Writ Petition No.4730 of 2005 PETITLOMER Sukaloo Ram

Versus

Union of India and others

^ And Writ Petition No.4839 of 2005 PETITIONER NiazAli

Versus

Union of India and others WRIT PETITIONS UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearanca is: fg jlli •I11 M ,..<iS|)ri1kJ®fn'Pandey, Advocate for'ffT8,Pej|G@ngrs. ..lii.lRI'fri N.K. Vyas, Assistant Solicitor GeneW!,jKByffijon pf India. g;|g''a°Shri Vinod DeshmLikbnAdvocate for ResponSgO&gi;,,, NAVIN SINHA, ACTIN©JfeUJ 1.

Heard LeameB.iifoiansellllfor the Petitioners and the Respondents.

^KV^ uTOt 2.

At the outset leave is sought to withdraw the applications. 3.

The writ applications are dismissed as withdrawn Sd//.

ActingChiefJustice sunita