Ashok Kumar Bhadoriya v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATI'ISGARH

AT BILASPUR W.P.(S) No.

339 4;/2013 /'

Ashok Kumar Bhadoriya, S/o. N.

~/V PETITIONER Bhadoriya, aged about 57"

ears, R/o. Odgi, Police Station and Post Odgi, Civil and Revenue District Surajpur (C.G.)

VERSUS

State of Chhattisgarh, through:

RESPONDENTS 1] Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Police and Revenue District Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) Collector, Tribal Welfare, Surajpur, District Surajpur (C.G.) Assistant Commissioner, Tribal 4] Welfare, Surajpur, District Surajpur (C.G.) /.7 WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR W.P. (St No.3894 of 2013 PETITIONER Ashok Kumar Bhadoriya

Versus

RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & others Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Present :- Shri Manoj Paranjape, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Y.S. Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for the State. ORAL ORDER (Passed on this 1S'day of January, 2014) W Heard learned counsel for the parties.

1.

The petitioner has preferred this writ petition seeking direction to the respondents to consider his case for posting as in-charge Block Education Officer, Odgi, district Surajpur pursuant to the order of reinstatement passed on 23.09.2013 (Annexure P-5). He would submit that on the date when the petitioner was suspended he was posted as in-charge Block Education Officer, Odgi, therefore, on reinstatement, he is entitled to be posted at the same place.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner woUld submit that for the present, the petitioner may be permitted to move a representation raising his grievance before the competent authority and the competent authority may be directed to decide his representation expeditiously.

Learned State counsel would submit that if the petitioner submits a .

.

fresh representation, the same shall be considered in accordance with law.

\

.

Considering the limited nature of relief claimed at this stage, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that in the event petitioner submits a fresh representation before the competent authority within a period of one month from today, the competent authority shai! consider and decide his representation as early as possible, preferably within a period of two months from the date of submission of representaticnv Sd//- "

Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge