Manharan Giri Goswami v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
(241 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH.
BILASPUR D.B.:
HON'BLE S Rl SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, g HON'BLE SHRI RANGNATH CHANDRAKAR, JJ.
Writ Appeal No, 595/2013 APPELLANT Manharan Giri Goswami, s/o Shri Jeevan Giri Goswami, Aged about years, Working as Assistant Grade-III, Office of Block Education Officer, Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon (CG) Civil & Revenue District Rajnandgaon (CG)
Versus
RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Schooi Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur(CG) Director, Public Instructions, Raipur, Pension Bada, Raipur (CG) District Education Officer, .
Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon (CG) WRIT APPEAL uNDER SECTION 2 QF CHHATTISQARH HIGH COURT (APPEAL TO DIVISION BENCH) AQT, 200§ Appearance :
Mr. B L Dembra Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. JK Gilda, Additionai Advocate General for the respondents/ State, on advance copy.
ORDER
(01.01.2014) SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, J.
1.
The appellant/petitioner was working as Assistant Grade-III in the office of Block Education Ofhcer, Dongargah, District Rajnandgaon. By an order dated 17.07.2012, he has been transferred to Government Girls
'
2% Higher Secondary School, Tilaikhar.
This order was challenged in a Writ Petition.
The Writ Petition was withdrawn with liberty to take recourse to other forum that may be available to the appellant. Thereafter, the appellant med a representation. The representation was dismissed. Then, again Writ Petition (S) No.3999/2013 was tiled.
The Writ Petition has been dismissed.
Hence, this appeal.
2.
Mr. Dembra submits that though the appellant has been transferred to Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Tilaikhar, Block Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon, but no such Institution is prevailing in the Block.
He further submits that it is on this account, the appellant has not been relieved till date and since July, 2012, he is getting regular pay 0%Lt'Y, y l from the offlce of Block EducationL-ongargarh. 3.
In view of the above submissions made by learned counsel for the appellant, we do not find any justification to pass any order on merits. 4.
The Writ Appeal is dismissed.
However, a liberty is reserved to the appellant to me another representation, making clear statement before the concerned authority, so that if required, necessary orders may be passed. Sd/- Sd/_ SUNIL KUMAR SHVHA KN CHANDRAKAR Judge Judge