← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4257/2013withdrawn

Rahul Kashyap v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS

2014-01-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra3 pages

This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.

YT U '

3W"?

'JMA '

-

IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF

x.

R CHHATTISGARH JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR l] [2013 W.P. (s!

PETITIONER:- Rahul Kashyap S/O Shri Shivnath Kashyap Aged About 22Years ("WM \F'ID <9 qZW/{z R/O Chandoripara Ward no. 8 R kw L'mnzv Wadrafnagar , r.

S, («)«Am {Mame "

'

Pre$emeé G.)r MUWJ?"

('0r i WL ated ?l"3./;.Q"H, FcvanxLDist -Balrampur (C.

awn/{43 '

VERSUS

RESPONDENTS:- (1) State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department ofHealth and Family Welfare Mantralaya, Mahanad i Bhawan Naya Raipur, P.S -Abhanpur District Raipur(C. G.) V

2. ChiefMedical and Health Oj7icer , Dist -Balrampur Ramanujganj (C. G.)

3. Dev Kumar Manikpuri S/O Shn' Narayan / Manikpuri HIM/ Aged about 30 yecfrs R/O Village post SuLsuli P.S. Trikunda v Tahsil Wadrafnagar Dist Balrampur (C. G.) K

4. Rakesh Kuma Kushwaha /'

S/O Shri Ramlal Kushwaha Aged about 32 years R/ O Village post & Tahsil Wadrafnagar, Vi" basin, {haw Dist Balrampur (C.

WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

WW,W,W w.zf..@...)....é;

1mm: m 1:71 2i) 3m! W (W) Maw-ca ammm Wmanfgérm WWW assq'marh!

S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra' 01.01.2014.

Shri Atul Pandey, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Y.S.

Thakur, Dy.

Adv'acate General for the State, on advance copy.

Heard.

Leaned counsel for the petitidner seeks'permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petitior with liberty to move a representation/objection before the pefzent authority challenging the m appointment of respondents No.' 3 4 on the ground that they have been'selected and appointed a3 Driv r even tl'iough they are not having i a certificate from recognized Motor ving Training School.

Prayer allowed.

Writ petition is dis-missed as hdrawn with aforesaid liberty.

t ln the event representation i decided against the petitioner he Court afresh.

> i would be at liberty to move before th / K ' SdlIMistrga ?rashant Kumar Judge L-