Gaurishankar Gupta And ORS. v. Anil Kumar Sethia And ANR.
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
.ilg III Ijljl tlJS ;';i:'li!;li'
IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
AT BILASPUR M.A. No.
/ 201S m^ MM :;ltl Miill ;8iiSii Gaurishankar Gupta S/6. late; Rrislina Chand Gupta, aged about. 63 years,^ 'Smt. Usha Gupta D/o. late Krishna !
Chand Gupta, aged about.
60' years through power of attorney Kolder Gaurishankar Gupta S/o. late; Krislina ChandGupta, ..
:
AEPELLANTS LXEFENDANTS 3^1 iil ws lli m Both are R/o. Joda Peepal, Ambikapur, P.S.
& Tahsil Ambikapur, Civil | & Revenue District. Surguja, District.
I, Surguja, C.G.
: | L^ Anil Agrawal S/o. Ishwarchand Agrawal, Director-Jai Hanuman Infrasfate Limited, aged about years, R/o.
Manendragarh Road, Ambikapur, P.S. & Tahsil Ambikapur, Civil & Revenue District. Surguja, District. Surguja, C.Gs.
VERSUS
m'
Anil Kumar Sethia S/o.Shrr Ghunpila] Sethia, aged about. 38 years, R/o.: Main Road Vardarnagar, P.S.
yardafnagar, Civil & Revenue District.
Balrampur, District. Balrampur, C.G. At present R/o.
Joda Peepal, Kedarpur, Ambikapur, |P.S.
8t Tahsil Ambikapur, Civil & Revenne District. Surguja, District.
!
;
Surguja, C.G.
RESPQNDENTS ^!•] 'i.'i State of C.G. through CollectorfSurgHJa;
Ambikapur, P.S.
& Tahsil Ambikapur, Civil & Revenue District. ^Siirgiaja, District. Surguja, C.G.
, , I .RespondentTtci. 4 MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL UNDER ORDER 4S RULE i QFTHECQDE OF CFVIL PRQCEDURE Being aggrieyed by the order dated 07.Ti.2oi3, passed ~bv*i8t Additional District Judge, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.), passed
75^ -^ww^, Qiil-a'is, Fqcii'M'j,< KAhte- SS/L5 sn^r •vw C^fs^t) sn^i-mfyiNr 'SV 3!i^I s?.tjit> <<>l<ilff<fl-i ll^df'ffft^ <R<(<;1< ^? aifiiH sil^l TOiiwdftasn^i S.B: HON'BLE MR.JUSTlCE SANJAY K. AGRAWAL 81.01.2014:
Ms. Priyanka Mehta;
Mrs. Chitra Shrivastbva counsei for the appellarts/defendants.
PL for the State/respondent No. 2.
Heard on admissionl This is defendants'l jappeal fited under Order 43 Rute (1){r) of the CPC against the orde^ dated 07.11.2013 passed by 1st Additional Distrtet Judge, Ambikapur,| |Distt. Sarguja in Ciwl Suit N0.11-A/2013 by which the trial Court has| granted temporary injunction in favour of respondent No.1/pla!ntiff| whereunder his property shall not be aSienated for a period of si} tc months.
AfSer arguing for soine time, leamed counsei appearing for the appeliants/defendants woiji -cohsideration since Sept^ ild submit that the civil suit is pending for ^mber, 2013 and looking to the fact that temporary injunction has |been granted for a limited period i.e. six months, a direction may b| ^ issued to the trial Court to decide the suit within a specified time frahe without being influenced by any of the observations made in the i^pugned order dated 07.11.2013.
Prayer appears to b^ fe fair and reasonable.
st I 1SIAdditional District Judge, Abmikapur, it is direcfed that thl Distt Sarguja will do we to expedite the triai of CM! Suit No.
11-A/2013(Ani! Kumar Vs |. Gouri Shankar Gupta & others) pending the suit as eariy as possibie preferably In his court and will decide waOiriSto^'TCRT,'
?-ES/48-8/20^· IU;:;li1 iKi1) Kw\ E:;t;y l.'l
7S[ ^1<11M<<, "g^tWI®,fafCTiyy '^20 ^..M^^...S.^...
an^ -CRR7 (^qf^^q) =r>i<<i<n41i ^w^ tf [s^ ^^.K '^aiRTOsii^?!
3lI^[^I^tRT 'a'^IT SfT^Tg^h?
TCnrn ?ifea sn^ii -2.
iths from the date of receipt of copy of this within a period of six mont| influertced by any of the observations made in order without being influerfl impugned order dated 07.1| l.2013..
appeal stands finatly disposed of.
Accordingly, the mis< Certified copy, as pe rules.
Sd/- Sanjay K. Agrawal Judge