Savitri v. Birchharam
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
géngm gga'm Savitri Wlo Shr'l Subran APPUCANT Aged about years, R/o Village Toiga,P.S.Khadgawan,Tahsil Manendragarh,District-Koria (Chhattisgarh)
VERSUS
Birchharam,aged about 60 years e ,son of Bodhsa'l, Resident of villag Tolga,Pelice $tation khadgawan , Tahsil Manendragarh, district Korla (C.G.) N L o.
''..
...
if'M
EIGH (3&UR1' OF CiiH&TTISG§hRH AT BELASP'UR SENGLE BENCH z H%N'BLE MR.
l'. $AI¥E KOSEY, J.
MALE. N0. 1225 OF 2013 APPLEC§NT Savitri
Versus
NG?J-&?E'LI£EAET Birchharam £PPLI£§TEOEE FOR RE$TORATION OF $A. NQ. 1 119i 1%99 gaggearance;
Mr. Sandeep Dubey, Advgcate, for the applicant. QRDER (1-1-2014;
Heard.
2.
The ap§1icant haS filed the instant appiication for resteratian of 8.1%. No.1 100/1999 which Wag dismi$sed for want 0f prosecution on 27.1 1.2G13.
3.
Having perused the application f0r restoration 0f S.A.
No.1100{1999, I am 0f the oginion that sufficient cause hag been explained by the couneet far the applicant for his non~ appearance on 2'7. 1 1 .20 13.
4.
Accordingly and in View of the above, the inetant M.C.C. iS allowed, order dated 27.11.2013 dismissing S.A. No.1}00/1999 for want of prosecution iS hereby recalled and SA.
No. 1100f1999 ie restored to its originai number. 5.
NO order as to costs.
6.
A copy of thie order be kept in the recorcl of SA.
No.
1100f1999.
Certified copy ae per rules.
Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge fSharad.'