P.Mahadevan And ORS. v. Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporation Transport Section Through Its Managing Directo
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
i"?
f ?
a6 /?
Q)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WRIT PETITION (s) No. 'i'a'x OF 2013¢§§ m (3:
PETITIONERS 1.
P. Mahadevan, S/O Shri K. Balaraman, aged about 60 Years, occupation - Assistant Mechanic, Grade-I, MPSRTC, (VRS Holder), r/o Bansal Auto $ Mobiles, Bilha Turn, Bilaspur District Bilaspur (CG) . Ishwar Das Kosle, S/ o Late j~ Kunwar Singh Kosle, aged '
about 49 Years, occupation - Conductor, CIDC, presently on deputation to the office of .
Public Relations, Bilaspur District Bilaspur (CG) Balrarn Yadav, S/o Late Shiv Prasad Yadav, agedabout 56 Years, '
Occupation a Peon, CIDC, presently on deputation to the office of 7 CG Batallion, NCC,Bhartiya Nagar, Bilaspur 7'
R/o behind Bararnbaba IVlandir, Purani Basti, Janjgir, District Janjgir~Cl1arnpa (CG) 4.
Ishwar Lal Sao, S/o Late ,Devraj Sao, aged about 50 years, occupation~Conducton CIDC, on deputation to the office of Superintendent of Police, Janjgir-Champa, presently posted Police Station Saragaon, resident of Police Colony, Saragaon, (Bhatapara) P. O.
Saragaon, District Janjgir-Champa (CG) 5.
Smt. Ramdasia Yadav, Wd/o Late Jankiram Yadav, aged about years, occupation of deceasedEx-Dl'iver MPSRTC, Ambikapur Depot, (VRS Holder), resident of '
Road, Babupara, Ambikapur, District Surguja ,5 Jail
6.
Umashankar Yadav, Son of Late Anandram Yadav, aged About years, Occupation Helper, CIDC, presantly on Deputation ITI, Sanjari, Tahsil Dondilohara, District Balod,resident of behind Shitala Mandir, Talapara, Bilaspur (Chhattisgasrh) 7.
Bodhram Patel, son ofLate Juglal Patel, aged about 54 Years, Occupation '- Black Smith Grade-II, CIDC, presently on Deputation Government Polytechnic College, Janjgir Resident of Village Parsahi,Post Bahtarai, Tahsll 8c Distt.
Bilaspur(CG) 8.
Madan Mohan Shukla son of Late B.L,Shukla, aged about years, Occupation - Rtd.
Sr.
Cashier, MPSRTC, r/o Near Labo ur Court, Green Park Colony, Jarahabhata, Bilaspur (Chhattisgasrh) 9.
Smt.
Pramila Yadav, Wd/o Late Ved Prasad Yadav, aged about 45 years, occupation of deceased- Ex. LDC,CIDC, r/o Village Ghuru, Post Tifra, P S Chakarbhata, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgasrh)
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS l.
Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporation (Transport Section) through its Managing Director, Shastri Chowk, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2.
Madhya Pradesh Road Transport Corporation through its Managing Director, Head Office, Habib Ganj, Bhopal (Madya Pradcsh)
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
ii HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH HON'BLE SHRI PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA J.
W.P. (S) No. 4434 of 2013 PETITIONERS P. Mahadevan and others.
Versus
RESPONDENTS Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporation (Transport Section) and another.
Shri D.C. Verma, counsel for petitioners.
se Shri Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate with Shri S.K. Dewangan counl for the respondent No.1, on advance c'y.
op ORAL ORDER (01/01/214) Petitioners have preferre this writ petition seeking direction to the d respondents-auorities to properly compute the statutory interest on the th amount impounded in the EDF omponents know in the jargon of the c n Corporation as 23%, 34% and 17% of DA to be caicuiated in the manner prescribed for General Provident Fund Accounts with further prayer to decide their cases as per the decision passed by this Court in the matter of G.K.
Gupta Vs. The Managing Director & Others, WP.(S) No. 6510/2009 together with other connected matters decided on 04/07/2011 and Writ Appeal No.
419/2011 together with other Writ Appeal decided on 16'" July, 2012. 2.
Upon hearing Iearned counsel for the petitioners and on perusal of the judgment rendered by the Single Bench and Division Bench of this Court, this .
.
,7 Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the present writ petition in the same terms.
3.
Petitioners would be liberty to move representation before the Madhya Pradesh Road Transport Corporation before whom the claim of the previous set of petitioner namely G.K. Gupta and others is under process.
On submission of representation by the petitioners within' a period of one month, the same shall be verified and if their cases are similar to the previous set of petitioners, their claim shall also be processed along with the claims of the petitioners of previous writ petitions in the matter of G.K. Gupta (supra).
'Sd//- '
Prashant Kumar Mishsa . Judge