Sukaloo Ram v. Union Of India And ORS.
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
^IP^^^l^^T 9S^M
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.)
WRIT PETITION NO^'736/2005 (S.B.) Sukaloo Ram, S/o. Shri Panchu Ram, aged about 51 years, <A.^y ^/ ^c^ ..-'y ^'
^y R/o. Village Potiya, P. O.
^ Medesara, (Nandini) Distt.- Durg (C.G.).
VERSUS
1} Union of India, Through : Secretary, Ministry of Iron and Sfeel, Parliament House, New Delhi.
2) Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd.
(A Public Sector Enterprise), through its Chairman - Cum - Managing Director, Kolkata.
3) Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd.
(Local Unit at r::-s»^"
-^^ Bhilai) through General Manager, P.
O.
Bhilai, Distt.
Durg (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS AND ANY OTHER ^ -^- ,.0 WRIT / DIRECTION / ORDER.
HIGH COURT QF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR SB-.HON'BLE SHRI NAVIN SINHA. ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE Writ Petition No.2466 of 2005 P.M. Shukla
Versus
Union of India and others Writ Petition No.24J7Af1i@5 •^i^Sii..
"Ifc.w -rrw^ ^i(j|ilg%B. Nayak ""^ j: '^--/up^ f.yy&'si^''
® Vr^t8'ft^-&Q!^ V1^1| Ji Union of India and others ^5»w^^<.,^,^,^^ ,®:lii.&i^,i..<y:;^.i<UAi^| ffMNt^iffiJMl No.2468 of 2005 '^% {^•f^^4^^4»^* %EP^/'
^sr^r^RT^ Prayag Choubey
Versus
Union of India and others Writ Petition No.4730 of2005/ Sukaloo Ram
Versus
Union of India and others
^--..
^'%.
And Writ Petition No.4839 of 2005 NiazAli
Versus
Union of India and others :v.
WRIT PETITIONS UNDERARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ^ m ^.
.....
Appearai^^ljy^ II fi.yi||?|£.|'
'Pandey, Advocate foPlheyegSinfirs.
1,1|fcffFi N.K. Vyas, Assistant Solicitor GeneW^lUpion of India. Vinod Deshmi^bn4dvocate for RespoffG^ A /"
N , ^ ^ ^; j^ s^ ^^. } 1 ?%..%.) :^ -.
.^-j^.y^^-.-^Si/K.'i'-fift'^^Sft.^lSl^ NAVIN SINHA, ACTIN( !3iS^y'2014) yff^riT?!
1.
Heard LearyeB .|f^|Hsel|{l,for the Petitioners and the Respondents.
^c^l^q ^RT^ 2.
At the outset leave is sought to withdraw the applications. 3.
The writ applications are dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Ag. Chief Justice sunita