← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/263/2022closed no costs

Varala Sai Kiran Reddy v. The State Of Telangana

2025-12-29K. Sarath6 pages

This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.

[ 3302 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 263 OF 2022 Eletween:

VARALA SAI KIRAN REDDY, S/o Varala Venkat Reddy, Aged about 21 \l"iri,-i." Student, R/o H No.3-13-9214, Surya Nagar, Mallapur, Uppal' It/ledchal-[\ilalkajgrri District.

SALVERU SAINATH, S/o Anjaneyulu, Aged about 36 years, Occ; Business, R/o H.No 12-14-75, Lalapet, Secunderabad.

.....PETITIONERS AND

1. THE STATE OF TELANGANA, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Secretariat, HYderabad

2. THEDISTRICT COLLECTOR, Yadadri-Bhuvanagiri District'

3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, Bhuvanagiri Division' YadadriBhuvanagiri District.

4. THE TAHSILDAR, Atmakoor (M) Mandal' Yadadri-Bhuvanagiri District' .....RESPONOENTS Petition Under Article 226 oI lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to pass an order, direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of Respondents in trying to delete the name of Petitioners from the Revenue Records which includes Dharani Portal in respectofagriculturelandadmeasuringAc.0.12ll2GtSinSy.No'296/A4l1/1. Ac.o12114GtSinSy.No.296/A4'Ac.o-12,1i4GtSinSy.No'297/A4,Ac.o.07114 GtsinSy.No2g7lA4l1l1,Ac.o0'11/4GtsinSyNo-298/A4l1/1,Ac012Gtsin S.y.No'298/44 together admeasuring Ac.1.29 Gts (belongs to Petitioner No.,1) and Ac.o.121/4GtsinSy,No.296/A4t1,Ac.O.12112GtsinSy'No.297iA4l1,Ac.0.05

Gts in Sy.No.297rA4t1l1, Ac.0.10 1t4 Gts in Sy.Nc. admeasuring Ac-1.00 Gts (belongs to petitioner No.2), situat V'illage and Mandal Yadadri-Bhuvanagiri District without as s and without issuing any notice and without following due pr rllegal, arbitrary, unjust and rn violation of principles of natural to the Telangana Rights in Land and pattadar pass Books (! 9BlA4l1, together rd at Atmakoor (M) gning any reasons ,cedure as it being ustice and contrary >ecial Tribunal) Act rtion of lndia and

9. 2020 apart from Articles 14, 2 j and 300-A of Consli consequently direct the Respondents not to delete the name I the Revenue Records which includes the Dharani portal in r"^ of Petitioners from ;pect of above said p r lperty.

|.A.NO:1 OF 2022 Petition Under Section 151 CpC praying that in the crr,; the affidavit filed in support of the petrtion, the High Coua trlRECT the Respondents not to delete/remove the narne respect of agricultu.e land admeasuring Ac.0_12 1/2 Gts r 4c0.12 1/4 Gts in Sy.No.296/A4, Ac.O.tZ 1/4 Gts in Sy.No I C:ls in Sy No.2g7tA4l1t1, Ac.0.01 1/4 Gts in Sy.No.29B/Aal mstances stated in nay be pleased to ; of Petitioners in Sy No.296/44l'l11 , 97144, Ac007 114 /1 , Ac.0.'12 Gts in sy No 298/44 together admeasuring Ac.1 .29 Gts (berongs to etitioner No.1) and 4c012 1/4 cts in Sy No.296/A4r1, Ac.o.12 1/2 Gts in sy r'l .2g7rA4t1, Ac0.05 Gts in sy No.2971A4t1r1, Ac.0.r0 Gts in Sy.No.2g1rA4t1, t(,( ether admeasuring A,<; 1.00 Gts (belongs to petitioner No.2), situated at Atmat:, or (M) Village and lVIandal, Yadad ri-Bhuvanag iri District from the revenue recor:; incruding Dharani Porta L C:ounsel for the Petitioners : SRI G.RAJESHWAR REDDY Counsel forthe Respondents:AGp FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORDER

a

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAI) THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.263 of 2022 TIIE ?9th DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 Between:

Varala Sai Kiran Reddy and another.

...Petitioners

AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretar5r, Department of Revenue, Secretariat, Hyderabad & three others.

...Respondents

ORDER:

This writ petition is hled under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following relief: ". . .to pass an order, direction or utrit more particutarly one in the nature of u-trit of mandamus declaring the action of Respondents in trying to delete the name of Petitioners from the Reuenue Record"s which includes Dharani Portal in respect of agiculture land admeasuing Ac.0.12 % Gts in Sg.No.296/A4/ 1/ 1, Ac.O.12 % Gts in Sg.No.296/A4, Ac.O.12 % Gts in SA.No.297/A4, Ac.0.07 % Gts in SA.No.297/A4/1/1' Ac.O.01 % Gts in SA.No.298/A4/1/1, Ac.0.12 Gts in Sg.No.298/ 4 togetler admeasuing Ac.1.29 Gts (belongs to Petitioner No 1) and Ac.0.12 '/o Gts in SU.No.296/A4/1, Ac.O.12 % Gts in SA.No.297/A4/1' Ac.0.O5 Gfs in Sy.No.297/A4/ 1/ 1, Ac.O.10 t/+ Gts in SA.No.298/ A4/ 1, together admeasuing Ac.1.OO Gts (belongs to P]titioner No.2) situated at Atmakoor (M) Village and Mandal, Yodadri-Bhuuanagii Distict ruithout assigning anA reosons and rttithout issuing ony notice and u.tithout follottting due procedure as it being

.inciples of 7 Rights i,1 tnal) Act 9, illeg,zl. arbitrary, unjust ond in uiolation of 1 natu ral justtce and controry to the Telangar LancL and Pettcdar Pass Books (Special Ti;

2O2O apart from Arltcles 14, 21 antL 3O0 A of direct the Con.stitution of Inait, and consequentlg Resp.ondents not to deciere the names c 1 fron' the Reuenue Records uhich include.s Petittoners te Dlnrani Pon tl i,t respect ol abouc said propertg .an ) : ) pdss.. . "

2.

Heard learned counsel appearing for the pi r:ior-ers, learned Assistant Ciovernment Pleader for Revenur appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 4 ald perused the material c I record.

3. Learnecl counsei for the petitioners subr rits that as per paragraph No.4 of the counter affidavit filer b1' respondent No.4, respondents are continuing the name. c 'the petitioners in the revenuc records as pattadars of the sr bject lanCs and the petitiorers ai:e receiving Rhythu Bandt arnounts under Rhythu Bandu Scheme.

4. In vieu. of the sarne, the cause of ac on in the writ petition doers not suryive.

5. Accordrngly, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no orCer as to costs.

a'

6. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.

--.

P.C. SULEKHA DEVI ASSISTANT REGIST I i //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To

1. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for\he tate of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 2 One CC to SRI G.RA

3. Two CD Copies cl *k JESHWAR REDDY. Advocat PU SA

HIGH COI.'RT HATED:2tl 11212025 I tHE Sra ( o .J , 17 r.o 2n/6 z6I * * ] sp^ rctrel

ORDER

WP.No.263 of 2022 CLOSING THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS.

J,+ us o