Sk.Safia Sultana Begum, Khammam Dist v. Sambashiva Rao, Khammam Dist

,':;;.i'

':.1,-'+x,.'.

,. .i'i;h ;1 ': I,ft''

'. ,i t$o3l oF TELANGNNN rNrHE H|GH ""r.[[ff$JI"TJsE FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE ;

,:

,:

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO CONT EMPT CASE NO:'1145 OF 2017 i Between:

ffi;

contempt case under section 'r0 ro 12 of contempt of courts Act rg71 to punish the respondent for contempt of court in wilfuHy not imprementing the orders dated 08.12.2016 in W.p.No.42695 0f 2016. a Sk.Safia Sultana Beoum. Wo. Late Janimiya, Muslim, Aged abo Konijerla, Khammarn-Disirict.

ut 81 years, Ryo ,J --i , , :'".683,./ !t-r _v-^kn ...PET|IoNER :--'*:f[.;j ':-1 i ,:

AND Sambashiva Rao, The Tahsildar, Konijerla, Konijerla Mandal, Khammam District RESPONDENT Counset for the petitioner: SRl. KASIBHATLA SAAKETH !

.,11.

.:$ Counset for the Respondent: Gp FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER r'-+..:

.

-:-.=,,.1 i a: ii.}s{!!;A'&ile :;it.d+*!Ei: >n# ..:

. . r+-ri6lA.'ry4 , - ::tEt; ''"lq'

'' ,'{ 't-i n 'l

-...

.--- HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENTVAS RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.1145 of2Ol7 ORDER:

The Contempt Case is filed for non-implementation of the order, dated 08.12.2016 passed by this Court in W.P.No.42695 of 2016.

2.

A perusal of the order, dated O8' 12'2O16 shows that this CourtwhiledisposingofW.P.No.426g5of2016directedthe respondent - Tahsildar to dispose of the representation' dated 15.06.2016 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law' 3.

The respondent/ contemnor hled counter a-ffidavit stating that pursuant to the order passed by this Court' the respondent issued memo uide R'C'No B/ 1265l2ol5' dated l4'O7 '2017 informing the petitioner that it is not possible to grant pattadar pass books arrd title deeds'

+ In vie-,r' of the compliance of the order of this Court' no further adjudication is required in the present contempt case' 5.

AccordinglY, the ContemPt Case ls closed. However, the petitioner is grarLted libertv to avail the remedies as available under

Iaw including questioning the rejection memo, dated, L4.OZ.2OIT passed by the respondent. No costs.

Miscellaleous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed SD/. K.SAILESHI DEPUTY RE1ISTRAR /\Y-- SECTION OPFICER ;

,t :i //TRUE COPY// +.ii !i'I To

1. One CC to SRt. KASTBHATLA SAAKETH, Advocate [OPUC]

2. rwo ccs ro cp FoR REVENUE, H;il Cill;ffi;d;re orretansana. at Hyderabad [OUT]

3. Two CD Copies pr l i, I'.'.i+4;'

r "

':.8 j i l i t :.

..1t A:

'/ ffi HIGH COURT DATED: 2911212023 ;+ 1F:

R Tfl5 S I,9 eo >^ .(.

:

, ' l,i $'".a,.r"rri:l ^ ({1 c(l 'l E am ?wt a) $- GC.No.1145 of 2017 ,,r.n

ORDER

* sPerc*+€s a'

1,j1, :i r-r .f.. i 4t ,ilL+n&-, - i 6i ;rEliisEl6 .-u 4u . t?!{!tlE4i } Yi :fnliiffi*ia.

l.

7",.i-t5a-. E I :'.'r'l :

, :.

tl' j+-r'ilit l i ri'i.'"j '

I t:"t ri'il CLOSING THE CC a.rr*fel (g)Y'

f, :S.:.$i.

#, L€"ilr* .3 ti':j:jt v*