Mohammad Khaja Moinuddin, Warangal Dist. And 2 Others v. M. Mohanachary, Warangal Dist.
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY,THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 273 OF 2017 Contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 Io Pleased to punish the Respondent for violation of the Honble Court order willfully, dated 15-1 1-2016 in W.P.No.39244 of 2016. Between:
1. lvlohammad Khaja Moinuddin., S/o Md. Galib, Age 54 Years, Occ Agriculture, Rl/o H.No.1 '1 -23-1239, L.B. Nagar, Warangal, Warangal District.
2. Mohammad Yousufuddin,, S/o Md. Galib, Aged 51 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o H.No.1 1 -23-566, Ramanthapur, Warangal Warangal dist.
3. Mohammad Arifuddin,, Sio Late Md. Ameenuddin, Age 40 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o H.No.9-4-134l1/5, Nadeem Colony, Mehadipatnam. Hyderabad.
...PETITIONERS AND M. MOHANACHARY, The Tahsildar, Zafargadh Mandal, Warangal District.
...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. K NARSI REDDY(NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR REVENUE (TG) The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.273 of 2017 ORDER:
The contempt case is frled seeking to punish the respondent under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, lg7 l, for deliberate and willful disobedience in implementing the order passed by this Court in W'P'No'39244 of 2016, dated 15.11.2016 2.
No representation on behalf of the petitioners in the morning and afternoon sessions. Heard learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of respondent.
3.
This Court while disposing the writ petition i'c ' W.P.No.39244 of 2016 on 15.11'2016, directed the 4th. respondent to consider the application made by the petitioners on 17.09.2016 and pass necessary orders thereon' if the same { t is still pending consideration, in accordance with law' after hearing the petitioners and the aggrieved party, if any' as early as possible, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the from the date of receipt of a copy of this order'
4.
Learned Assistant Government pleader basing on the instructions submits that, the respondent complied with the order passed by this Court in W.p.No.39244 of 2O16, dated 15.11.2016.
In view of the above submission, no further adjudication rs required 6 '
Accordingry, the contempt case is crosed. However, the petitioners are granted liberty to avail the remedies as are available under law, if so advised.
Pending miscellaneous appiications, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- K.SAILESHI DEPUry //TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to SRl. K NARST REDDY Advocate tOpUCI
2. Two CCs to Gp FOR REVENUE (TG) ,High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]
3. Two CD Copies ti t TL NS {nq.
HIGH COURT DATED:2911212023 1r Zli [i'u Uii
ORDER
) t!
* * T ?;
cr ..
CC.No.273 of 2017 CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE M.\, rz\-t*'