Sandaboina Yadaiah v. The Government Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.By Its

[ 3302l

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE.STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO:32593 0F 2011 Between:

sandaboina Yadaiah. s/o Durgaiah, .Agricurture R/o.H.No.1-1-12, shasha Mahera Karimnagar Town, Karimnagar bistrict ...PETITIONER AND The Government of Andhra pradesh, rep.by its, Revenue Divisional officer, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District The Tahsildar, Mandal Karimnagar, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District Mohammad Yunis, S/o.Mohd.lqbal Business R/o.MlG 2.15 Housing Board colony Near Susmitha Hospital, farimnigar forin'kfrilrnagar oistrict J .,.RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 of rhe constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particurarry one in the nature of mandamus, decraring the inaction of the respondent No.

1 Revenue Divisionar officer, Karimnagar in not considering and passing appropriate orders on the representation dated 14-12.2010 in Fire No.Dt7789r2o1r as arbitrary,iilegar. l.A. NO:1OF 2011(WPM P. NO: 40521 OF 20111 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the 1st respondent herein i.e. Revenue Divisionar officer, Karimnagar to consider the Representation in Dr77Bgr2o11 dated 14.12.2010 fired by the petitioner by passing appropriate orders thereon pending disposar of wp No. of 2011 filed by the petitioner.

counselforthePetitioner:SRIP.V.NARAYANARAo(NoTPRESENT) Counsel for the Respondents No.1&2 : GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : SRI BANKATLAL MANDHANI The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PEIITION No.32593 of 2OlL ORDER:

This petition is coming for hearing since 2011. On 17.12.2024, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, and therefore the matter was directed to be tisted today under the caption "for Dismissal". Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute this case.

2, Accordingly, the Writ petition is dismissed for Non-prosecution/default. There shall be no order as to COSTS Pending miscellaneous appiications, if any in this petition, shall stand closed N SHAMBA SD'. P.CH.

ASSt AGABHU TREGISTRAR ,,TRUE COPY,, SECTTON OFFICER ",I ?$: BBjijSi",XIAHItH,HSi tXL"* i"':il3Bi"? or rerangana :';?"i"'i;I BANKArIAL MANDHAN t' Advocate toPucl

4. Two CD CoPtes'

BSK PSK

HIGH COURT DATED:3111212024 -z'a:'= ./ ..-\.

/''

(:

':/l i: ) i iri25 .;'-':.,,"

:;.. tt)f

ORDER

WP.No.32593 of 2011 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS I + I I I I I I Zt4 L'

lc"pr I I t i l ,