N Sivaiah v. The State Of Telangana
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
H'GH COURT FOR THE ST s o;",I i 3,I5,3i l|l3ji:,fli Ar HvDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIR rwo rn o tj's'll5ffr J ffiY. ffi ;st,,e en PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR WRIT PE TITION NO:26s80F2019 Between:
1. N Sivaiah,. S/o N Laxmaiah Aged about 62 xurmioaa viraju, Vr'.r,",u, r,,rrr"oiinl"""g:'*".i0'r"Bl'+,$,nisil]l,lr',1; Svt:te2-61,
2. N Balrai, S/o N Laxmaia,h.Aged about 64 years, Agriculturist, Rt/o 2_61, Kurmidda Villase. yacharam Mandat R"*s; R;;;y 6iriiiiti ,eransana stare ...PETITIONERS AND
1. The State of Telanoana Represented by its principal Secretary, Revenue Department, SecretarTat, HyoerSoio, fet;s'r;;. ' ' '' The Manag]ng Director of rerangana rndustriar rnfrastructure corporation TSIC, ParisramaBhavan,Basheerbaghi,nyOeriOiO. --"
) The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District Lakadikapool, Hyderabad. The Joint District collector, Ranga Reddy District Lakadikapoor, Hyderabad. The Revenue Divisional Officer, RDO Saroornagar, Hyderabad. The Assistant Director of Survey, setflement and Land Records Ranoa Reddv District Collectorate Campound, Lakadikapool, Hyderabad. o The Tahsildar, Yacharam lr/andal, Ranga Reddy District. RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 o'f lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, direction or an order more particularly one in the nature of Writ of l\,4andamus by invoking Article 226 of Constitution of lndia declaring the action of the action of the Respondents ih not considering the representation of the Petitioners Dated 14.5.
to Compute the Comper sation as per the Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act 2013a rd pay the difference amount also' further direct the Respondents to determin I the actual lands under the occupation of the Petitioners and their family membe rs possession by conducting a Re-survey by the 6th Respondent Assistant Dir )ctor of Survey Department into the Acquired lands for the Hyderabad Green Pharr ra by the Respondents and thereby do jLrstice to the Petitioners.
lA NO: 1 OF I Petition under Ser tion 15't cPC praying that in the circum{itances stated in the affidavit filed in supp' ,rt of the petition, the High court may be prleased direct the 2nd respondent to consi( er the representation of the Petitioner dated 14.5-2018 and dispose the same immec ately as per law pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass such other c'der or orders as this Hon'ble Court may cleerns fit just and proper in the circumstan:es of the case. pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petition, rs: SRI D. SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respon, lent Nos. 1, 3 to 7: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Responr lent No.2: SRI L. PRABHAKAR REDDY, S,C. FOR T.S.l.l.C. The Court made the foll< wing: ORDER
THE HON'BTE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR T Q8qF8 Learned counsel for the petitioners filed a letter dated 28.12.2021 into the Registry seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. Learned counsel reiterates the said request in the open Couft. In view of the same, the writ petitjon is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed in the llght of this final order. No order as to costs, SD/.K.SAILESHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR \ //TRUE COPY// To, SECTION OFFICER
1. One CC to SRI D. SURESH KUMAR, Advocate tOpUCl
2. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]
3. One CC to Sri L. Prabhakar Reddy, S.C. for T.S.l.l.C. (OPUC)
4. Two CD Copies.
5. One Spare Copy.
IVP TR (')
HIGH COURT DATED:31 11212021 5.IAT€ O6 bf 'Yn i 1s lrntszz ?) t) 4;l ,+.- * // \itv ,'rf:./ ,.d59;/
ORDER
WP.No.2638 of 2019 DISMISSING THT WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN rl, WITHOUT COST