K. Bala Kistaiah v. Telangana State Road Transport Corporation And 4 Others
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original J urisd iction) THURSDAY ,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTIGE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI wRlT PETITION NO:4301 OF 2020 Between:
K. Bala Kistaiah, S/o Late Ramaiah, Aged about 53 years, Occ. Ex-Conductor, E.800204, R/o.11-63, Redipally Village, Alladurga Mandal, Medak District502269. ...PETITIONER AND
1. Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, Rep. by its lr/anaging Director, . 8us Bhavan, RTC X Road, Hyderabad.
2, The Executive Director (O), TSRTC, O/o lVanaging Director, Bus Bhavan, RTC X Road, Hyderabad.
3. The Regional Manager, TSRTC, Medak Region, Sangareddy.
4. The Divisional l\,4anager, TSRTC, Sangareddy Division, Sangareddy.
5. The Depot [\,4anager, TSRTC, Bus Depot, Narayankhed, Sangareddy District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Ivlandamus.
To declare the action of the respondents in not reinstating the petitioner into service as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of A(icle 14 and 21 o'f Constitution of lndia.
To declare the order passed by respondent no.5 (dt. 2010412017), order passed by respondent no.4 (171071201 7), order passed by Respondent No.3 (dt. 1610212018), order passed by Respondent No.2 (dt. 0111212018), as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 1 4 and 21 of Constitution of lndia as they are passed with zero application of mind and with departmental bias and reinstate the petitioner into service with all consequential benefits, attendant benefits including back-wages from the date of suspension.
To declare the action of respondents as Unfair Labour Practice iv. Any other order or orders, this court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of this case L ii.
t lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service with all consequential benefits, attendant benefits and back-wages, by considering the petitioners representation dt. 1910312019 and 2110612019 submitted before the 4th and 2nd respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition in the interest of justice and fair-play. Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. V SIDDHARTHA GOUD Counsel for the Respondents: SRl. N. VASUDEVA REDDY, SC FOR TSRTC The Court made the following:
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI $(/.P.No.4301 of 2020
ORDER
Lcarned counsel appearing lor the petitioner seeks permission to rvithdrau' the rvrit petition rvith libertv to thc pctitioner to prlrsue his remedies in accordztncc rvith lau,. Rcscn'ing strch libertv, the Writ Pctition is dismissccl as u'ithdrarvn, No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if anv, pending shall stand closed.
I t SD/.K.ONESIM ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY'
SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to Sri. V. Siddhartha Goud, Advocatg{q?qql-..^-
2. O;; Cc io sri N. Vasudeva Reddy' SC for TSRTC [OPUC] 3, Two CD Copies.
l PN/ ry,/
HIGH COURT DATED:3111212020 Ia e ( co 12 JA!{ 202t i 4=
ORDER
* WP.No.4301 of 2020 PAT .i Dismissing the WP As withdrawn Without costs.
SN \ c--,ogieA )r 1i\or F"