← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRP/295/2016dismissed

E.Srinivas, v. Shravan Badruka

2021-12-31Chillakur Sumalatha3 pages

This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.

HICH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY,TI IE THIR'ry FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER IWO TI IOUSAND AND TWENry ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITI ON NO: 295 OF 20'16 Petition under Sec.22 of AP Building(Leave,Rent,Eurction) Control Act, "1960, aggrievecl against the Judgement passed in RA No. 172 of 201,4 dated: 26.1.0.2015 on the file of the Additional Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court at Hyderabad, Preferred against the Order dt: Zg/3/14 r\ RC 177 /10 on the file of V Addl. Rent Controller, Hyderabad. Between:

P.91t1"yL,- S/S Mallaiah, Aged 55 years, Occ:Business in premises No.159483, Mehboobgunj Hyderabad ...REVISTON yETTTTONETVRESpONDENT AND

1. Shravan Badruka, S/o. Mukundlal Badruka, A Business, ge 42 years, Occ:

Shyanr Badruka,, S/o. Mtrkr-rndlal Badruka, Aged 41 years, Occ: Business, Both resitltnts of IJ.lr-o.8-2-686 /9 /9 & 10, Roa c-l No. j 2, Banjara l-lills, FIvd era ba d.

...RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS I.A. NO:1 OF 2016(CRP MP. NO:364 OF 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC ;rrayirrg that in the circumstarrces stated in the affidavit filed in support of tl-re petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the orrler ;rassed in RA No.1Z2 of 2014 datecl: 26.70,20-15 passed by the Aclditional Chief Judge, City Small Causes Courr, Hyderabad.

Counsel for the Petitioner :SRL DAMODAR MUNDRA Counsel for the Respondents: SRI R A ACHUTHANAND The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON' ILE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMAI.,AT]|{A CtVI , REVISION PETII'ION NO.2q 5 (]F 2016 ORDER:

Learned ( )unsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has been settl d between the parties and, therefore., the Civil Revision Petitior may be dismissed.

Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision petition is dismissed as in ructuous.

There st all be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if my, pending shall stand dismissed. I SD/-I.NAGALAKSHMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR \--.

SECTION OFFICER To, ,/ //[RUE COPY//

1. The 1$ Addi :ional Rent Controller, Hyt{erabad.

2. The Adtlitio ral Chief Judge, City Small Causes Courts, Hvclerabad

3. One CC to :,ri Damodar Munclra, Arlvocate [OPUC,]

4. One CC to S ri R A Achuthanantl, Ar{vocate [OPUC]

5. Two CD Co ries

6. One spare c )py CHG TR

HIGH COL RT DATED:3U tU2021, ,rE rtArr{ ( /4 q 1l ,J liJ 15 FEB20U 'f, \\ - i) t r,r.;Ia' .{.

ORDER

CRP.No.29i of 201,6 CIVIL RE'/ISION PETITION IS DISN{ISSED AS INFRUCT JOUS I c4 I