Indus Towers Limited, v. The State Of Telangana,
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
[ 31681
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRry FRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO:622 7 0F 2020 Between:
lndus . Towers Limited, surve.y . No.133-4-5i , gth Floor, sLN Terminus, beside QoJqnlcat Gardens, Gachibowti, Hyderabad--50005r, A;it.'uv iG Ciicii"Li,iri#;; Sri P.Purushotham ...PETITIONER AND
1. The State of Telan Department, Rep.
2. Jagtiyal Municipatity, Rep.by its Commissioner, Jagtiyal, Telanganahate r gana, Municipal Administration and Urban Develooment by its Principal Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad.' RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction especially one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the reiection order vide Roc.No.G1/164 gtzolg, dated 11.09.2019 issued by the 2nd respondent through which the 2nd respondent rejected permission to the petitioner to erect relecommunication lnfrastructure Tower (Tlr) i.e. Roof rop Tower at H.No.6-3-274l1, adnreasuring 882 Sq.Yrds.
, Munur kapu Sangam, near Mutyalapochamma Temple, Jagtiyal, Telangana state as arbitrary, illegar, contrary to law and also the provisions of Municipalities Act and Rules framed there under and against the G.o.Ms.No.g6, dated 05.08-2015, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Government of relangana and in violation of the well seftled principles of natural justice consequently set aside respondent.
the said rejection order issued by the 2nd '\:*.-|,
IA NO| 1oF 2020 PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed irn support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspendthereiectionorderRoc.No.Gltl64Sl2olg'dated1,1/09/2019issuedby the2ndrespondentthroughwhichthe2ndrespondentrejectedpermissiontothe petitionertoerectTelecommunicationlnfrastructureTower(T11.)i.e.RoofTop Tower at H.No.6-3-274ll,admeasuring 882 Sq.Yrds.Munur kapu sangam, near Mutyalapochamma Temple,Jagtiyal, Telangana State pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI E.POORNACHANOER RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.l : GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV Counsel for Respondent No.2: SRI RAPARATHI VENKATESH' Sc FOCGHMC The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI WSTICE K. IIII{SHMAN WRIT PETITION No.6227 of20/20 ORDER:
Heard Sri Raparthi Venkatesh, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.2.
2. Sri Etooru poornachander Rao, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner filed a letter dated LO-L2-2O24 before the Registry seeking permission of tfri" Court to withdraw the present writ petition.
3.
Permission is accorded.
4. This Writ petition is dismissed as vrithdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if arry pending in the Writ petition sha_[ stand closed. SD'- K.SREERAIIIA URTHY ASSISTAN ISTRAR //TRUE COPYI/ SECTION OFFICER To,'1. One CC to SRI E.POORNACHANDER RAO, Advocate. [OPUC]
2. Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]
3. one ic to Snt RApnRnrHt VENKATESH, sc FoR GHMC.IoPUcI
4. Two CD Copies.
BSK PSK ,'
HIGH COURT DATED:3111212024
ORDER
WP.No.6227 of 2020 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT GOSTS /z t{ /2,/<{