Sri Sai Krupa Catering And Maintenance Services, v. The State Of Telangana
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 8508 OF 2021 Between:
Sri Sai Krupa Catering and Maintenance Services, Rl/o H.No.'1-8-43, Rajendra Nagar, Hyderabad. Rep by Sri N Rajender Prasad, S/o N Venkaiah, Aged: 4Syears, Fl/o H No. 1-8-43, Rajender Nagar, Apert Ranga Reddy District. ...PETITIONER AND
1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by jts Principal Secretary for Panthayat Raj And Rural development, SRTGN Bhavan, Erramanzil Colony, Hyderabad.
2. The State of Telangana, lnstitution of Rural Development I Rep. by its Commissioner, Police Quarters, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Hyderabad.
3. The State of Telangana lnstitution of Rural Development, Rep. by its Chief Executive Officer, Police Quarters, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Hyderabad.
4. The State of Telangana, lnstitution of Rural Development, Rep. by its Joint Director (Administration), Police Quarters, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Hyderabad. RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring that the action of the 3rd respondent, in issuing the Office Order No. 1084/A3/ESTT/TSIRD/2016, dated 30.03.2021, keeping the petitioner-firm in block list for a period of 5 years, without giving notice or an opportunity to the petitioner to represent its case, unilaterally cancelling the agreement dated 18.11.2019, with effect from 01.04.
2021, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the terms and conditions of the Agreementv executed by the 4th respondent with the petitioner-firm, violative of principles of natural justice, violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the constitution of lndia and set aside the same, by holding that the petitioner is eligible and entitled to continue service of sri sai Krupa catering and Maintenance Services, as per the Agreement dated 18.1 1.2019.
lA NO: 1 OF 202't Petition und,'r section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed rr support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the opera ion of the Office Order No. 1084/A3/ESTT/TSIRD/2016, dated 30.03.2021, issued :y the 3rd respondent, with a direction to the 3rd respondent, to continue the Sri Sai Krupa Catering and Maintenance services, as per the,Agreement datr d 18.11.2019, pending disposal of the above writ petition, pending disposal of he above writ petition.
lA NO: 2 OF 2021 Betwee n:
'1 . The State of Tr langana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary for Panthayat Raj And Rural developr rent, SRTGN Bhavan, Erramanzil Colony, Hyderabad.
2. The State of Tr langana, lnstitution of Rural Development I Rep. by its Commissioner, Police Quarters, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Hyde'abad.
3. The State of Tr langana lnstitution of Rural Development, Rep. lry its Chief Executive Offic rr, Police Quarters, Rajendra Nagar Mandal Hyderabad.
4. The State of Te angana, lnstitution of Rural Development, Rep. by its Joint Director (Admir stration), Police Quarters, Rajendra Nagar l/an,lal, Hyderabad.
...Petitioners/Respondents
AND Sri Sai Krupa Ca ering and Maintenance Services, R/o H.No.1-B-43, Rajendra Nagar,Hyderabad. lep by Sri N Rajender Prasad, S/o N Venkaialr, Aged: 45years R/o H No. 1-8-43, F ajender Nagar, Apert Ranga Reddy District ...RespondenUPetitioner Petition under Ser tion 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in suppo t of the petition, the High court may be pleas,:d to vacate the interim order dated 06, )4t2021 Made in lA.No.1/2021 in wP No.8508 0f 2021 . Counsel for the Petiti< ner: SRl. CH VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respc ndents: THE ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL FOR GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT The Court made the fo lowing: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T, VINOD KUMAR Writ Petition No.E5O8 of 2O2l ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner addressed a letter dt.2o.l2.2o2l to the Registrar(Judicial) High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad, seeking permission to withdraw this Writ Petition stating that the respondents have agreed to remove the petitioner-Firm from blacklist and settle the pending bills of the petitioner. However, liberty is sought by the petitioner to approach this Court in the event the matter is not settled with the respondents.
2.
Cranting liberty as sought for, this Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. 3.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
v SD/-T.TIRUMALA DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY/i SECTION OFFICER 't. On" CC to SRl. CH VENKAT RAMAN Advocate [OPUC] z. One CC to SRl. ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL (TG) Advocate toPUCl - 3.TwoCCstoGPforPanchayatRajandRuralDevelopment,HighCourtforthe State of Telangana at Hyderabad' [OUT]
4. Two CD CoPies
5. One Spare Copy To ,IR BS \\-\>
HIGH COURT DATED:3011212021 p ?- sl Al'€ o.'i .
/., / .) ,J 0s l[i{20?
,/
ORDER
WP.No.8508 of 2021 DISMISSING T}IE WRIT PETITION .
aIwitroRA\A N wlrHour cosrs \iw tt^i.t,