← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/6312/2014withdrawn

B.Madhusudhan Reddy v. Government Of Andhra Pradesh

2022-12-30Mummineni Sudheer Kumar4 pages

This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.

[ 32s6 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 6312 OF 2014 Between:

'1 . B.lrr'lad husud han Reddy, S/o. B. Rukma Reddy Occ: Business No. 17-1-4818. Old Santishnagar Colony Saidabad Hyderabad

2. D. Ravindra, S/o. D. Mohan Occ: Private Employee Rl/o.14-1-15511 Street No.2 Opp. Hanuman Temple Sainagar Colony Kanchanbagh Ranga Reddy District

3. P. Balaiah, S/o. P. Pochaiah Occ. Govt. Servant Rlo. 17-1-3821D165 Hanuman Nagar Saidabad Hyderabad

4. Dr. M. Sanjeeva Rao, S/o. Late I\/. Gopal Rao Occ: Business No. 17-1387141 Vani Nagar Saidabad Hyderabad 'i i ...PETITIONERS AND

1. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary ( Endowments) Secretariat Saifabad Hyderabad

2. The Commissioner, Endowment Department-cum-Competent Authority Government of Andhra Pradesh Tilak Road Hyderabad

3. The Asst. Commissioner, Endowment Department Tilak Road Hyderabad

4. The Executive Officer, Sri Venkateshwara Swamy Temple Santoshnagar Colony Hyderabad

5. B. Arjun, S/o. Yellaiah Occ: Retired employee R/o.EWSH 157 New Santhoshnagar Colony Saidabad Hyderabad - 59

6. P. Narayana Reddy, S/o. Late NArayana Reddy Occ: Retired Employee Rl/o. No.104 LIGH, New Santhoshnagar Colony Saidabad Hyderabad - 59

7. P. Suresh Babu, S/o. Late Xomaraiah Occ: Employee R/o.38, LIGH, New Santhoshnagar Colony Saidabad Hyderabad - 59

8. Smt. A. Sathyalaxmi, Wo. Pentaiah Occ: House wife, Employee, Rl/o. No.L|GH 76, New Santhoshnagar Colony Saidabad Hyderabad - 59

9. Sri N. Chendrasekhar, Chairman of Sri Venkateshwara Swamy Temple Santhoshnagar Colony Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia p -aying that in the circumstances statec in the affidavit filed therewith, the F igh Oourt may be pleased to issue a wr t, order or direction, more in the nature of \Vrit of I\,4andamus declaring the order rassed by the Second Respondent n l,4enro in RC No. C312296412013 daled 26-02-2014 in appointing the Responcents 05 to 09 herein as nonhereditary trus ee to the Fourth Respondent temple ar J :he consequential order in Proceedings Nc. RC. No.

E/1038/2013 dated 01-0:i-2C14 issued by the third Respondent wi houl following due procedure, without conc ucting proper enquiry and wlthout taking into consideration the objecliors raised by the Petitioners and other levotees of the said temple as corrtrar'/ tc, the provisions of the Act 30 of 1987 an, I treing against the interest of the 4th Res,pondent temple. I.A. NO: .t OF 2014(W rMP. NO: 7846 OF 2014) Petition under :iection 151 CPC praying that in the cirr;unrstances stated rn the affidavit filed in : upport of the petition, the High Court ray lre pleased to suspend the operatior of the order passed by the Second Responde:nt in Memo tn RC No. C3/22964120'3 dated 26-02-2014 in appointing the Resp,ondents 05 to 09 herein as non-hered tary trustee to the Fourth Respondent ternple and the consequential order i r Proceedings No. RC.

No. E/,l038/2C':i Jat€,d 01-03-2014 issued by the third Respondent seeking to administer oath of office to Respondents No. 5 t, r 9 on 04-03-2014 at 04-30 pm or any otner date pending disposal of the above rurit petition.

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2014(W >l\4P. NO: 25726 OF 2014) Petition under liection 151 CPC praying that in the crrcurl'stances stated in the affidavit filed in sr pport of the petition, the High Court may he p eased to stay all further proceedin,ys regarding appointment of temple tru:ite€s to the 4th respondent temple including the consequential pr::eedi-rgs bearing Rc. No. E3/2296 412013 daled 10-7-2014, pending disposal 3f th3 above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petiti rrrers: SRl. V HARI HARAN Counsel for the Resp >ndent No.4: SRl. CH SATISH KUMAF, Sr: FCR ENDOWNMENTS,TEI. ANGA Counsel for the Resp rrrdent No.1,2 and 3: GP FOR ENDOWIVE\T:; Counsel for the Resp rndent No.5 to 8: K VENUMADHAV The Court made the f rllowing: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI i'USTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.6312 of 2OL4 ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioners filed a letter, dated 27.12.2022, in the Registry seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.

2.

Permission is accorded.

3.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this rvrit petition shail stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/. K. AMMAJI ASSISTANLREGISTRAR ctb SECTION OFFICER To, //TRUE COPY'

\ One CC to Sri. V Hari Haran, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri. CH Satish Kumar, SC for Endowments, Telangana, OPUCI Two CCs to GP for Endowments ,High Court for the State of Telangana. louTl One CC to Sri. K. Venumadhav, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies TJ .

GJPA,-

HIGH COURT DATED:30112'2.022 '.. .: o

ORDER

;i !) :l: i,l::i l:ux o WP.No.6312 r>12014 .+ )t /. E +:,r} r a:; nj/ DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRI.WN WITHOUT COSTS.

/t7\ ( '5) TE 4 o\r\t>