M/S.Hyderabad Rock Sand v. Appellate Deputy Commissioner (Ct)
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
I [ 32ss ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 14909 OF 2020 Between:
M/s.Hyderabad Rock Sand, Sy.No.14, Sultanpur (V) Patancheru, Mandal.Telangana- 502319 represented by its Proprietor C. Satyanarayana Reddy S/o. C. Sitaram Reddy,aJed about 63 years, residing at Hyderabad I ..,PETITIONER AND
1. Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT), Secundrabad Division
2. Assistant Commissioner (CT), Audit, Nizamabad Division, Nizamabad
3. Commercial Tax Officer, Sangareddy, Nizamabad Division
4. State of Telangana, represented by the Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad. ,..RESPONDENTS I Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, direction or order more particularly in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the assessment order A.O.No. 21877 daled 31-03-2018 passed by the Respondent No. 2 and consequently the impugned ADC Order No. 980 dated 28-05-2020 passed by the Respondent No.
1 as being void, illegal, violative of Article 265and consequently Article 286 of the Constitution of lndia, totally without jurisdiction and violative of the principles of naturaljustice lA NO: 1 OF 2020 i Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings and consequential actions pursuant to the ADC Order No. 980 dated 28-05-2020 passed by the Respondent No. 1 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. M, NAGA DEEPAK counsel for the Respondents: SRl. K.
THE, II ]N'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHTTYAN AND THE I,ON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY \/RIT PETITION No.l49O9 of 2O2O ORDER: Pu ,L : rbn'ble tte CtLtcj,tt;Lice lJjlet Bhuyai) Heard Mr. M.Naga Deepak, learned counsel for the petitioner zrr d Mr. K.Raji Reddy, learned counsel for the respondents.
2.
Learner I counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to One Tim : Settlement (OTS) Scheme introduced by the Government , rf Telangana, petitioner has settled the tax dispute with the Stat:. Therefore, petitioner would like to withdraw the writ petition.
3.
In vier.' of the above, writ petition is dismissed on rvithdrarval.
I Miscell. rneous applications pending, if any, sha1l stand closed. Hor,r,e ver, there shall be no order as to costs. I i Sd/-MOHD SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// 7iI SECTION OFFICER \ To,
1. Two CCs to G I FOR COMMERCIAL TAX ,High Court for the State of Telangana, at I {yderabad[OrJT]
2. One CC to SR M. NAGA DEEPAK, Advocate IOPUC]
3. One CC to SR K. RAJI REDDY (SC), Advocate IOPUC]
4. Two CD copies BM I]S t.t
\ t HIGH COURT DATED:30112t2022
ORDER
WP.No.14909 of 2020 ( 1 11c- STA re, co 13 ,tAlt 2[23 .{ f \ * ,<\) DISMISSING T'HE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWAL WITHOUT C;oSTS (s q\t\t