M/S.Hyderabad Rock Sand v. Appellate Deputy Commissioner (Ct)

[ 32s5 I HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original J uriscl iction ) FRIDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND THE HONOURAE}LE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 148'19 OF 2020 Between:

M/s.Hyderabad Rock Sand, Sy.No.14, Sultanpur (V), Patancheru, I\/andal, Telangana- 502319 represented by its Proprietor C. Satyanarayana Reddy S/o. C. Sitaram Reddy, aged about 63 years, residing at Hyderabad ...PETITIONER AND

1. Appellate Deputy Comm jssioner (CT), Secundrabad Division

2. Assistant Commissioner (Cl ). Audit, Nizamabad Division, Nizamabad

3. Commercial Tax Officer, Sangareddy, Nizamabad Division

4. State of Telangana represented by the Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad. RES'ONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, direction or order more particularly in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the assessment order A.O.No. 21872 daled 3110312018 passed by the Respondent No. 2 and consequently the impugned ADC Order No. 979 dated 28105/2020 passed by the Respondent No.

1 as being void, illegal, violative of Article 265 and consequently Article 286 of the Constitution of lndia, totally without jurisdiction and violative of the principles of natural justice lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the tircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings and consequential actions pursuant to the ADC Order No. 979 dated 28-05-2020 passed by the Respondent No. 1 I Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. M. NAGA OEEPAK Counsel for the Respondents: SRl. K.

TH '

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE IIJ.'AL TIHUYAN AND Tr E HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHlrStlAIl l:lEfrDY WRIT PETITION No.14819 of 2(t'.2io ORDE\:

l, er the Hon'bLi, tLre Ohief Justti t t.ltctl Dhuu(l,1] Hea 'd Mr. Ivl.Naga Dcepak, learned c rr ns,:l for the pelitior-rer ancl Mr. K.Raji lieddy, learned cl ns(il for the responder: ts.

2.

Lear ne d counsel for Lhc petitioner slrbrnit,; lha, pursuant to One 'I irne Settlcment (O'l'S) Schenrc intr,r:lucr'<1 by the GoVernme rt ol Te Iangana, pctitioner has s,:ttle rl tl rc t.lx dispute with the S -ate. Thereforc, pctitioner ri,oulcl like .o wirhdraw thc \\rrit I)etiti( n.

3.

In r iew of tl're above, writ petition is :lisrnissed on withd rrlwa .

Misc:llaneous applications pending, if zLrr.y , s tall stand closerl. H< rvever, there shall be no order as to c.Jltrj. I Sd/-MOI.{D SA N,I\UL LAH ANSARI ASSISI','\N] REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// :iE:CTIO FICER To,

1. Two CCs to GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX ,High Court for the State of Telanoana.a HvderabadfOUT'l

2. one 6c to ;R1. M NAGA DEEPAK Advocate [oPUC]

3. One CC to S Rl K. RAJI REDDY (SC), Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CD cop es BM us 8nC,,

HIGH COURT DATED:3011212022 .r'

,lA* g $TATq (j

ORDER

WP.No.14819 of 2020 l tl, ,i:

lr ':

( 1s lfiil ?0n l:

-, ,'i ).< '// \.! '

,} ? :',-.- -- ':

..

-.., DISMISSINC THE WRIT PETITION AS IAII']'HDRAWAL WITHOUT COSTS @g*c''

ts\t\'.g '