S.V.N.Raju v. Vikas Raj I.A.S. And 3 Others
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY ,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI CONTEMPT ASE N i 817 F 201 contempt case fired Under sections 10 to 12 of contempt of courts Act to punish the respondents herein for their deliberate and willful disobedience of the Orders of the High Court made in W.p.No.22 of 2019 dated 03.01.2019. Between:
S.V.N Raju, S/o_.Venkata suryanarayana Raju, Age. 50 years, occ. NIVR Electrician, Bhadrachalam Gram Panchayat, Bhidracha16m, e"haaraoii kottiagrJe, Districi-'" AND ...PET|TIONER 1 Yi\:: Raj l.A.S. Principat Secretary, panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad. Hyderabad.
2. K.Ramakrishna Rao, lA.S., principal Secretary, Finance and planning, Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hlrderabad.
3. Neethu Kumari Prasad, I.A.S., Cohmissioner of pR and RD, Urdu Galli, Himayatnagar, Hyderabad - S00 029.
4. R.A.s.P. Latha, District Panchayat officer, Kothagudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.
.,.RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4 lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order in Rc.No.P2l20s12019, dt.1s.04.2019 passed by the District Panchayat officer, Bhadradri Kothagudem, the 4th respondent herein, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI V. SUDHAKAR REDDy Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1,3&4 : G.p FOR pANCHAYAT RAJ Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : G.P FOR FINANCE AND PLANNING The Court made the following: ORDER
IHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI cONTE MPTCASENo 81 7 ol 201 9 ORDER:
When the motter is loken uP for heoring, leorned the resPondenls hod Government Pleoder oPPeoring lor contended thot the order possed by this courl hos been compried regulorized vide witlr ond the services of the petitioner were proceedings doted 30 12.202,1 ln view of the obove subnnission' lhis Court is of the considered view thot the order possed by this Courl hos been comPlrecl with Accordingly. ihe Contemp't Cose is closed No costs' Pending mrscelloneous pelitions' if ony' sholl stond closed' SD/- C.V.MALLIKARJUNA V-ARMA DEPUTY REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// SECTIbN OFFICER "'iUl&''6:J,$^1'.'l-lllij*l;i-,lJ,l:il::ffi :;"':;'"'''' i H$'.#;"lt'slJfi?tt':f ql;llffi*iil; ot pn'no RD Urdu Ga " iiiriiv,tn's"' ryg91:f3:;"unu&3i3*.",., Kothasudem, Bhadradri Kothasudem +. n.n.5.P Latha, Distt :
o?ikbm Y i#srls,l&?tH'ilil3f,%%l'?l:,ll" """
or reransana at Hvderabad (OUt) z t'lro CCs to G P for Finance & Planning' High Court for the State of Telangana at o ?x,o*ot3lp%' s"*it"-ll' High court for the state of relangana at Hvderabad (OUT) g. two CD Copies
10. One SPare CoPY ks TRk
HIGH COURT DATED:31 11212021 o'
-rAE STA74, Q^ .r'.
?.il21 l:
ORDER
2 7 l$!q ::) :l l.
CC.No.817 ot 2019 +i .a i.... , - CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS.
4"j lt-