National Insurance Company Limited v. Parcha Bhagvanth Rao And 2 ORS
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 255 OF 2009 Appeal filed Under section 173 of M.V. Act against the Judgment and Decree made in o.P.No.463 0f 2003 dated 21 .12.2006 0n the file of the court of the chairman, t\/lotor Accidents Claims Tribunal-Cum-ll Additional District Judge (FTC)' at Adilabad' Between:
National lnsurance company Limited, represented by its Divisiolal.[vlanager, The Oivlsionat lr/anager, Nitionat lnsuranie Company Limited Divisional Of;ce, Ambedkar Chowk Adilabad.
...APPellanUR'2 AND
1. P archa Bhagvanth Rao, S/o. Jalla, occ. Agriculture, Fl/o. Varthamannur, N/andal lchoda, Adilabad District
2. Parcha Laxmi Bai, W/o. Bhagwanth Rao, occ. Agriculture, R/o. Varthamannur, IVandal lchoda, Adilabad District 3.Ch'Ganoanna,W/o.BapuRao'aged.tMajor,occ.ownerofTipperbearingNo. AP 1T 3i27 R/o.H.No.8-75, Dasnapur, Adilabad
...Respondent/Petitioners. 1 ,2 and R'1'
Counsel for the Appellant: SRI N. MOHAN KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondents: SRI LAKKADI DAYAKER REDDY The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD MACMA No.25s OF 2009
JUDGMENT
During thc pcndency ol Lhc appcai, thc tnatrer u,as rel-erred to rhe Lok Aclalat, ancl the szrmc \vas se nlcd bclbre thc Lok AclalaL. vide Award datcd 07. ) l.2A2O.
Accordingly, the MACMA is disposed of, in terms of rhe award piLsscd by the Lok Aclalat. No ordcr-its to costs. Conscquentlr,, r-r-risccll:rncoLts .ljclitjons, il. an_r,, pcrrriiriu 1n this appca.l shiL1l sti_urcl c.loscd.
SD/. N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGIS RAR //TRUE COPY// To, SEGTION OFFICER
1. Ttre,chairman, Motor Accidents claims Tribunal-cum-il Additional District Judge (FTC), at Adilabad. (With Records)
2. One CC to Sri N. lr/ohan Krishna, Advocate tOpUC]
3. One CC to Sri Lakkadi Dayaker Reddy, Advocate IOPUC]
4. Two CD Copies (Along with a copy of Lok Adalat ))
HIGH COURT TAJ DATED:3111212020
JUDGMENT
MACMA.No.255 of 2009 It* '
T4 14, s r{ (t ,?
.) oo 12 JAN 2021 Jr * ct.s Jct DISPOSING OF THE M.A.C.M.A IN TERMS OF LOK ADALAT AWARD. I o -,1lv
BE[':'3[IE Ti-1fi tOK ADALAT iii;i.D AT I']YDERABAD [Orgonized by llif-]h Cc]rr$ Legol Services Commillee High Couil ior ihe Siote of Telqngono (Througll', Vi<,lr:o C,lnference mode) Under Seclion 'l g of lhe [eg,]l S6ivic€'s l\ulhorilies Acl, l98Z (Cenlrot Act)l MACMA No. 255 of 2009 (Betore lhe Hon'ble High Court) (Agoinst lhe order in oP.No. 463 of 2003 on lhe fite ot the choirmon. MACT-cum-ll Additionot District Judge (fIC) ot Aditobod ) :ll A p pello nl/ R es po n de n t No.2 Notionol lnsuronce Compony Liffrited, Rr.:p. by iis Divisionol r\ilonrrger, Di,risionol Office, Ambedkcrr Chowk.
Adilcrbcrd.
I I I I &espondenls / Petilioners i.2 & R-I l l-'orcho Bhogvonth Rool S/o. Jollo, Agecl 40 Yeors, Occ: A riculiui-e a F'crrcho Loxmi Boi, W/o Blrogvonth Rco, Aged 35 Yeors. Occ: Agriculture ,.\.:',/ Both ore R/o. Vorlhomqnnur, N/ondcrl lchodo, Dislricl Aclilobod.
I I i Ch. Gongonno. S/o. Bopu Roo, Aged N,1ojor, Occ: Owner of Tipper Beoring No. APIT-31 27, R/o. l-l.No. 8-75, Dosnopur, Adilobod [No. of proceedings of the High Court Legol Services Commiitee: O RDER ROC.No. I 035/HCLSC I 2020, Doled 04-1 1 -20201 :: Present ::
f',lome oi Choirnron : Hron'ble Sri Juslice F.Nqveen Roo, Judge, High Court for the Stote of Telongono. :(l) Sri S. Surender Reddy, Advocqte, High Court for the Siote of Telongono
(2) Smt. hlondilo Guho, Advocote High Court for ihe Stote of Telongono/ Sociol Worl<er.
I,lome of Members AW,ARD The obove cose be arcen llie potties hoving been referred for determino f ion to lhe LOK ADr\t-z:iT ond the poriies hoving compromised the cose / rnoller, the following Aviorcl is possecj in terirs of the settlement: l. l.his M1ACA A orises oul of the order cloted 21-12-2006 in d -n =L) t\\ OP.No. 41,3 ol 2003 c,n the tile of lhe Choirmon. l",lACT-cumll Additionol Districl .Judge {FTC) ot Adilobod.
2. The Tribunol hos gronfecJ compensotion of Rs. 2.25,000/-'(Rupees Two lcrklts twerriy iive ihousond only) io thc peliiiorrcrs v.,riir ,/- tproportionote cosls ond interest GD 7.5"/o per crn|rL,nr korrr lire cjote r:t
3. Aggrieved by the order, the lnsuronce Compony hos preferred this oppeol. ln view of the lotest Judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of lndio, New Delhi, ond in consultotion with the victim, lhe Appellont/lnsuronce Compony inlends 1o withdrow lhe oppeol.
4. The Appellont / 2nd Respondent - Notionol lnsuronce Compony Limited, is represented by Smt. Sujotho K.Kurnor, Monoger, who hqs represented online over the link provided by the High Court Legol Services Commitiee, High Court for the Stote of Telongono, ond she seeks permission to withdrow the oppeol. Accordingly, the Appellont is permitted to withdrow.
5. ln view of the obove represeniolion mode on beholf of the Appellont/lnsuronce Compony, lhe oppeol stonds disposed os wilhdrown.
6. The Insuronce Compony is reody to deposit lhe remoining decreetol omount wilh occrued interest ofter giving due credit to the omount olreody cleposited, wilhin (30) doys from the dote of receipt of copy of this oword.
/. The porties ore informed thot the couri fee, if ony, pcrid by ony of thern sholl be refunded.
B. No order os to the costs of ine oppeol.
"i l-or ar. lA.
C]o. Ltd lnsLlrat tce Appellont/ Bpffffirt-{ffi"T:!
lnsuronce Compony ('
*.Ar )!.,aai lt qyk^ Choirmon Member Dote: 0Z.l L2020 ;//t;, 'n i'
.!.) of the Grmirriftee) i- r-- .. - - ."-