M. Shyam Kumar , Shyam Mantri, Hyd v. M/S. Belly Talk, Hyd
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1037 OF 201 1 Petition under Antde 227 of Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the order dated 2010112011 in lA No.3962i2010 in OS No.371/2010 on the file of the Court of the ttl Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, Between:
IM.Shyam Kumar @ Shyam Mantri, ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/PETITIONER AND M/s. Belly Talk, a proprietary concern Rep by its Propritress, Smt. Preeti Khandelwal, ...RESPONDENT/PETITIONERYRESPONDENT CRPMP. NO:1461 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to pay or to deposit a sum of Rs. 32,16,000/- towards rent accrued till 31-8-2010 and continue to pay or deposit future rents till the r respondent surrenders vacant possession of the suit schedule property covered under OS No. 371 of 2010 on the file of the lll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, and atso direct the respondent to deposit a sum of Rs. 2,80,000/- in respect of the tenancy covered under licence agreement dt.
6-9-2008 and continue to deposit Rs. 10,000/- per monlh till the surrender of the same, pending disposal of the above CRP CRPMP. NO: 6416 OF 2012 Petition under Section 15'l of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herewith, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent / tenant to pay to the petitroner an amount of Rs. 21,01,000/- towards the security deposit amount and also an amount of Rs. 9,82,420l- to be deposited in the court towards the service Tax component CRPMP. NO:5955 OF 2011 The Petition filed under Section 148 of Cr.PC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herewith, the High Court may be pleased to extend the time by six weeks for depositing the amount of Rs. 14,355,711 towards the amount due to the petitioner in CRP.MP.No.1461 of 201 1 in CRP.No.
1037 ot 2Oi1 dl. 0s109t2011 For the Petitioner : SRI T.NATRAJ, Advocate For the Respondent : SRI P.
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE P. SREE SUDHA CML REVISION PETITION No.1O37 of 2O11 ORDER:
As per the case status information, O.S.No .37 I of 2OlO on the file of XXV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad (lll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad) itself was disposed of on 24.8.2017 . Therefore, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/.N.CHANDRASEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR I //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER \ I To The lll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, fiyderabad' One CC to Sri T.Natrai, Advocate (OPUC) One CC to Sri P.Panduranga Rao, Advocate (OPUC) Two CD Copies One Spare CoPY I Kj
HIGH COURT DATED:3111212021 TAr€ S e t\ c) t r z o nFs f r,I +
ORDER
CRP.No.1037 of 201'l DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
(t