S. Rajkumar v. S. Manohar
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
[ 3413 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRSI DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY CITY CIVIL COURT APPEAL NO:221 OF 2007 Appeal under section 96 of C.P.C against the Judgment and Decree Dated 20107|2OOG made in O.S.No.57 of 2002 on the file of the Court of the XI Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Fast Track Court, Hyderabad. Between:
S. Rajkumar, S/o Late S. Appa Rao, Occ: Business R/o 3-5-911/A, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad, ...AppellanUDefendant No.1 AND S. Manohar, S/o late S. Appa Rao, Occ: Business, R/o 3-5-911/A, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad.
...RespondenUPlaintiff
2. S. Sudhakar, S/o late S. Appa Rao, Occ: Business, R/o 3-5-91 1/A, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad.
3. S. Diwakar, S/o late S. Appa Rao, Occ. Business, R/o 3-5-911/A, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad.
4. Smt S. Shakuntala, Wo late S. Appa Rao, Occ, Business, R/o 3-5-91'1/A, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad.
...Respondents/Defendant Nos.2 to 4
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2007(CCCAMP. NO: 594 OF 2007 Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in pursuance of the judgment & decree dt.20-07-06 in OS
r No.5Tof2002onthefileofXlAdditionalChiefJudge,CityCivilCourt'FastTrack Court, at Hyderabad, pending disposal of the main CCCA' in the interest of justice' Counsel for the Appellant : Sri R Veera Reddy (None appeared) Counsel for the Respondent NoJ : Sri Thanniru Srinivas Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 : Sri V Subrahmanyam The Court delivered the following: Judgment
"7/ THE HON'BLE SRI .IUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY C.C.C.A.No.22l OF 2OOz JUDGMENT:
(Per the Hon'ble Si Justice Abhinand Kumar Shavili) None appeared for the appellant though the appeal is iisted today under the caption 'for dismissal'. Hence, this Court has no other option except to dismiss the appeal for default and also for noni prosecution.
2. Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed for default as well as for non-prosecution. No costs.
3.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending if any in this appeal, shall stand closed.
Sd/. K. SRINIVASA RAO T REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// \ lo ECTION OFFICER
1. The XI Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad
2. One CC to Sri Thanniru Srinivas, Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to Sri V Subrahmanyam, Advocate IOPUC]
4. Two CD Copies Fast Track Court, ADK/plp @i
HIGH COURT DATED:31 112t2024
JUDGMENT
CCCA.No.221 of 20Ol 1HE Sl4 14:
!,< ,'.2q\ k C'
1 I ilAn 2025 ,i) Snr.T-ir DISMISSING THE APPEAL FOR DEFAULT AS WELL AS FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS