Nimma Ravinder Reddy v. The State Of Telangana And Another

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5136 OF 2020 Between:

Nimma Ravinder Reddy, S/o. late N. Venkat Reddy, Aged 54 years, occupation. Business, Rl/o. Flat No 201 , H. No. 17-1-383/106, Nagaria Residency, Saidabad, Hyderabad.

......PETITIONEFYACCUSED NO 1 AND

1. The State of Telangana, Represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court for the state of Telangana, At Hyderabad.

2. Smt. K. Sulochana, W/o. K.Krishna Reddy, Aged about 50 years, Occ.. Housewife, Rio. Villa No.41, Edent.Garden, Kokapet Village, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 500 075.

.....RESPONDENTS/COM PLAINANT Petition under Section 482 AND 483 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstancbs stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Complaint and investigation in Crime No.593 of 2020, dated 2810712020 of Narsingi Police Station, Cyberabad and grant l.A. NO: 2 OF 2020 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the investigation including arrest of the petitioner pursuant to the complaint and investigation in Crime No.593 of 2020, dated 2810712020 of Narsingi Police Station, Cyberabad.

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri DIDA VIJAYA KUMAR ,Advocate for the Petitioner and the Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri M.BHOOPATI Advocate for the Respondent No.2 The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NA(iII,RJ'UN CI IIMI:NAL PETITION No.5 136 of 2C :2O ORDER:

This Cr minal Petition is filed seeking quashment of Crime No.593 of 2('2O dated 28.07.2020 of Narsingi Police Station, Cyderabad, r:gistered against petitioner/Accused No. I for the offence under Sect.ions 42O, 406,5O6 of the Indian l)enal Code and 156(3) of the ( )riminal Procedure Code.

02. No repr:sentation on behalf of the petitioner. Sri S.Ganesh, learned Assis ant Public Prosecutor for respondenl No. 1/State as well as Sri M Bhoopathi, learned counsel for respondent No.2 are present.

03. Sri S.( ianesh, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent N l. i /State has submitted that the po]i,:e ,:oncerned have complet,:d the investigation and charge shee,. rvas also hled and numbere C as C.C.No.2973 of 2O2l and to tlra[ extent liled copy of procr:edings of the E-Courts pertaining '.o thrs case of PJCJ-cum-AI\ [M Courts, Rajendra Nagar.

04. In vie'r of the facts and circumstanc:s, since the investigation is completed and charge shect is fiied, the very purpose of filing the Criminal Petition to quash Crirne No.593 of

) 202O is defeated arrd thereby the Criminal Petition has become infructuous and liable to be dismissed.

05. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

As a sequel, pending Miscellaneous Applications, if any, shall stand closed.

//TRUE COPY// ossi8lfiffi3fnan \ sEcfrHN oFFlcER To, i*#tti*+q,rltii.Hli##*-gH'"'tl*;:;::ff i:1"""""

' ai Hvderabad [oUTl

5. Two CD CoPies \P

HIGH COURT DR DNRJ DArED:3011212022 , /l1o* 1r{E. ST4IA 16 FEB 208 (>

ORDER

CRLP.No.5136 of 2)20 c :-l . ,// .'^'., 'rt .fE i).

< .'--,- DISSMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUSi )sr{ \j