Telugu Film Producers Mutually Aided Cooperative Society Ltd v. Appellate Deputy Commissioner (Ct) And 2 Others
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
I [ 32e5 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJA.L BHUYAN AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 19842 OF 2020 Between:
Telugu Film Producers Mutually Aided Cooperative Society Ltd., Sy. No.239 and 240, Movie Towers, Kokap'et, Rajendranagar, R.R. Dist. Represented by its authorized signatory, Mr. Tammareddy Bharadwaj, S/o. Gopal Tammareddy, Aged about 72Years, Rl/o. Hyderabad ...pETlTlONER AND '1. Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT)/Appellate Joint Commissioner (ST), Hyderabad Rural Division.
2. Assistant Commissioner(ST), Special Commodities Circle, Saroornagar Division, Hyderabad.
3. State of Telangana, represented by the Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad. RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, direction or order more particularly in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the assessment order A.O.No. 43375 dated 0610912018 passed by the Respondent No.2 and consequently the impugned ADC Order No.1755 dated 241091 2020passed by the Respondent No.1 as being void, illegal, violative of Article 265and consequently Article 286 of the Constitution of lndia, totally without jurisdiction and violative of the principles of natural justice.
lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings and consequential actions pursuant to the A.O.No. 43375 dated 06-09-2018 passed by the Respondent No.2 and consequently the impugned ADC Order No. 1755 daled 24-09-2020passed by the Respondent No.1.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.NAGA DEEPAK Counsel for the Respondents: SRI K.RAJI REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER
Irffi HO]'I'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL TI I{II]'AN AND THI ) HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHA SI(AR ,FIED DY WRIT PETITION No. 19842 of :2O2trt) ORDER: ee.the hon'ble the Chief Justice U.jjat BhuVarL) Hearrl Mr. M.Naga Deepak, learncd cc,urseI for the petitioner rnd Mr. K.Raji Reddy, learnr:d cc,u:rsel for the respondent;.
2.
Learr ed counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to One Ti ne Settlement (OTS) Scheme intrccluced by the Governmen t of Telangana, petitioner has settled [he tzlx dispute with the St rte. Therefore, petitioner would like to withdraw the writ petitior L.
3.
In vj:w of the above, writ petition is ciisnrissed on withdrawal Misq llaneous applications pending, if ar1,, shall stand closed. Ho,uever, there shal1 be no order as to cos;l;:. SD/. N. CHANT)RA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT.REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// L ll )-.-- SECTION OFFICER To / i I One CC to SF I M.NAGA DEEPAK, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SF I K.RAJI REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copir rs PSK.
GJP
t HIGH COUR]'
DATED:3011212A22 --tr=:=\ 'ni',i '4\) o'
\r- - ,1 .;:
s'
'\ Ir .:'
lr ':
lrt, ':
\i:i \.:
F,\ cb f , l
ORDER
WP.No.19842 of 2020 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION ON WITHDRITW,AL WITHOUT COSTS.
C6 o CoQ\q:, $h- ')/\ \r\).>