B.Valya v. Sri. M. Dana Kishore, (I.A.S)
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
( 3304I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO CONTEITfiPT CASE NO: 1313 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION No.2557 of 2025 Contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to summon the respondents and punish him for willful and deliberate disobedience in compliance of orders dated 31i01i2025 passed in W P.No.2557 of 2025. Between:
B.Valya, S/o. B.Basu, Aged about 45 years Occ. Assistant Labour Officer, Shanishabad, Ranga Reddy District, R/o Plot No.29, Road No. '14, Priyadarshni Colony, Kuntloor Road, Beside Electricity Sub Station, Bagh Hayathnagar, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Pin- 500 505. ...PETITIONER AND Sri. M. Dana Kishore, (l.A.S), The Commissioner of Labour, (FAC) at T.Anlaiah Karmikha Bhavan, RTC X Roads, Near Devi Theatre, Chikkadapally, Hyderabad. Telangana State. 500 020.
...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. Boya Ravinder Reddy Counsel for the Respondent: Government Pleader For Services ll The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF II LANGANA
AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU R,,I IESHWAR RAO CONTEMPT CAS No.1313 of 2oil i IN WRIT PETITION No.2557 OF 2O:l i 29th December,2025 Between:
B. Valya ..,Petitioner AND Sri M. Dana Kishore . .Respondent ORDER:
Heard learned Government Pleader for Servicr s-III, appearing for the respondent.
2.
This Contempt Case is filed alleging violat r n of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.2557 of 2025, datec 11.01.2025. 3, Learned counsel for the respondent placec a letter dated 10.07.2025 and informed this Court that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.2557 of 2025, dated 31.01.2025 h;r' been complied with.
4.
In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent, the Contempt Case is closed, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach afresh, in case of any grievance. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Contempt Case, shall stand closed Sd/. V. HARI PRASAD OEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ECTION OFFICER To Two CCs to Government p retanqana. [oUTl leader For services ll, High court for the state of flS 33 t""Bi:rud,'
Ravtnder Reddv, Advocare [opuc] 2.
3.
Pr'l)R t,^4y I i
HIGH COURT DATED: 2911212A25 Ilrr S i4 ,i"
:('
/tj'
llP 'j. r t)i'.9..
t I ril'l{ t
ORDER
\,, ;oATC CC.No.1313 of 2025 CLOSING THE CC T 1k \[