Smt.Narriburu Lakshmi v. Authorized Officer

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.20765 0F 2020 Between:

1. smt. Namburu Lakshmi, W/o. Namburu . satyanarayana, lged 56 ^years, proorietrix. lVl/s. Sri viiuprr.Ln, Haooern Dal [r/ili, R/o.'8-31, Teachers colony. Santhinagar. Wyra, Khammam District

2. Namburu Satyanarayana, S/o . . Venkateswarlu' -A99d. 6'1 years' R/o B-31 ' - iJ".iuti cotoirv, saittrinagar, wyra' Khammam District' ...PETITIONERS AND Authorizedofficer,stateBankoflndia,Mstr/E.20g25BranchSrinivasaPlaza, e;;r;d FtoJi D].roro-2-+ a io-z-slA, Besides over Bridge' Mamillasudem' Khammam.

Authorized officer, State Bank of lndia, stressed Assets Recovery Brg.ng.h iiA*id; TSRic io-..rtuinm-eniiv C'entre, Bus Terminal complex' Koti' Hyderabad.

Sri Padmanabuni Satyanarayana, S/o not known' Age not known' Sai Gayatri Rice tvlill, Khammam, Khammam utstrtct The Reoistrar, Debts Recovery Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench' lll Floor' Triveni Comple.-x. Abids. HYderabad.

RESPONDENTS PetitionunderArticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstances stated in tne ariJavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to ;.;; ; writ order or direction especially one in the nature of writ mandamus ,J o".Lring that the action of the respondents in putting auction of the property belongs to petitioner (incruaing piant andrnachinery' land and building) in D No 9-49' Sv.No.249lB GundratimadugJ'Vitt'g", Shantinagar' Konijerla Ir'4andal' Khammam B[l),.i"" irno)ztzd ,t r"i,Lr prici than the mirket value is illesal and arbitrarv' b) declare that the action of the'respondents bank in seeking to register the. above :j ;ffi;"il;';;"";;;;f iio' r""ponount is iilesat and arbitrary.

c) dectare that the action of the respondents in noi considering ihe representation of the petitioner autia, zanotzO2O and not allowing the petitioner to clear his due amount to respondent bank is illegal IA NO: 1 OF 2020 PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedinthe ariaavit iiieo in support of the petition,'the Hign court may be pleased to. direct the 1st and 2nd respondent not'iegisier the propeiy (including plant and machinery, land ,nt-nriroingl in D.No.9-49, "sv.No.2aglB, Gundratimadugu Village, Shantinagar, Konijerla Mandal, Khammam' OiJfrict in favour of 3'd respondent, pending disposal. of the Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI SRINIVASA RAO MADIRAJU i.r"."f for the Respondent Nos' 1&2: SRI N' MEHER PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No.3: ----- The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN Writ Petition No.20765 of 2020 ORDER: lPer Sri Jus A, Raiash ker Recklv) Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.

Permission is accorded and the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. lnterim order granted by this Court on 20.11.2020 shall stand vacated. No order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand dismissed.

SD/- K.ONESIM ASSISTANT REGIST \ ,TRUE COPY'

SECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to Sri' Srinivasa Rao Madiraju' Advocate IOPUCI

2. One CC to Sri N lVleher Prasad' Advocate IOPUCI

3. Two C.D. CoPies Prk C'.

HIGH COURT DATED:3111212020 1 HE sla l-t.

( .)o ,'

.t I JAN 2021 7c -1, I \

ORDER

WP.No.20765 of 2020 Dismissing the WP.

as withdrawn without costs.

.L- \\