Sri. Bhargava Kurella, v. The State Of Telangana,
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
\ [ 348s ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRI,DAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF MAY , TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 17007 OF 2026 Between:
Sri. Bhargava Kurella, S/o. Sri. Kurella Panduranga Chary, Aged about 32 years, Occ. Software Employee, R/o. H.No.7-2-71 134, Durga Nagar, Bairamalguda Village, Saroornagar lt/landal, Ranga Reddy District-500079, Telangana State.
...PETITIONER AND 'l . The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department. Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Station House Officer, Meerpet Police Station, Ranga Reddy District,
3. M. Sandhya, Wo. M. Venkatesh, Aged about 20 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o. H.No.1-30, Champapet Village, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State.
...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondent No 2 in interfering with the civil dispute between the Petitioner and the 3rd Respondent in respect of the schedule property, which is the subject matter of Vacation O.S. No.54 of 2026, as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia, and consequently direct the Respondent No 2 not to interfere with the civil dispute, title, possession and enjoyment of the Petitioner over the schedule property, except in accordance with law.
LA. NO: 1OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No 2 not to interfere with the civil dispute, ti e, possession and enjoyment of the Petitioner over the schedule property, except in accordance with law. pending disposal of the above writ petition, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BANDI SAI VAMSHI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1&2: AGp FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.3: - - - The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAI) THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO WRIT PETITION No.L7OO7 of 2o26 DATE: 29.05.2026 Between:
Sri Bhargava Kurella
...Petitioner
AND The State of Telangana Rep bir its Principal Secretary Home Department Secretariat' H-vderabad and 2 others
...Respondents
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed seeking to grartt the following relief:
".. .to issue a rurit ord-er or direction more particularlg one in tle noture of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declartng the action of the respondent No.2 in interfeing uith the ciuil dispute betueen the petitioner and the 3'd respondent in respect of the sclrcdule propertg uhich is the subject matter of 1.A.No.889 of 2026 in Vacation O'S'No'S4 cf 2026, as illegal, arbitrary, tttithout jurisdiction' and uiolatiue of Articles 14' 2 1 and 3OO-A of tLLe Constitution of India, and consequently direct tle respondent No'2 not to interfere ttith the 17iuil. dispute, title, possession
end erioAtnent o.f the petitioner ouer the scLledule propertA except in accordance uith lau_, and pass. . . " 2.
Heard Sri Bandi Sai Vamshi, learned counsel for the petitione r and learned Assistant Government pleader for Home appearing on behalf o[ respondent Nos.l and 2. 3.
The grievance of the petitioner that, the respondent No.2-pohce is interfering with the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondent No.3 in respect ol the schedule propertv in O.S.No.54 of 2026, despite pendency of civil proceedings before the competent Civil Court. 4.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel fbr the pr:titioner reiterated the contentions raised in the affida'it filed in suppcrt of the writ petition, and contended that the res pondent-polic. authorities are interfering with the civil disputes of the pctitioner, at the behest of unofrrcial respondent. 5.
Per contrct. learned Assistant Government pleader for Home u'ould conten d upon receipt of complaint from the petitioner, respondent No.2 investigated into the matter and closed :,'te case as <:ivil in nature and that thev are neither
J calling the petitioner to the police station nor interfering with the civil rights of the petitioner at the behest of respondent No.3. 6.
Recording the above said submissions, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
SD/.HUSSAIN ALI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// I SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to SRI BANDI SAI VAMSHI, Advocate [OPUC]
2. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]
3. Two CD Copies PM BS
VACATION COURT HIGH COURT DATED: 2910512026 1t\g s rA)-f k 1O JUN o z
ORDER
^r * t Og5, ,6.i!-::
WP.No.17007 ot 2026 CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS rt 0 ^9